Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 4.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake
#39
(12-30-2020, 11:04 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: Dont tell him how the Steelers are 12-3 either with 2 really good LBs hurt too.

We're the only team with injuries and only our coaches improve! Year 3 baby! Zac is entering his prime!!!

I'm not going to mock anyone for hoping ZT can get it, particularly since it's clear he's going to be here at least 1 more year.  With that being said, the reality that we are in a division with two teams with long-term successful coaches and another team that has a 10+ win rookie HC makes it hard to look at ZT as needing more time and more like he's just not all that good.

The Browns didn't wait for Kitchens or Hue to snap out of it and get better, and their first year into hiring a guy who actually had a shot at being good has done them wonders.  We are hoping our HC can do in year 3 what the Browns did in year 1?  That's not the sort of scenario Bengals fans would have gladly accepted, I fear.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake - Nately120 - 12-30-2020, 11:10 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)