Recent history says keeping Zac is a mistake

[MileHighGrowler]

(12-31-2020, 09:10 PM)SuperBowlBound! Wrote: SPECIFICALLY injuries to our top players have hindered it. We also have a rookie QB.
We had a losing culture for the last 15 years that will not be easy to change.
Some players preferred the way it was under ML and did not put forth effort.

We have been watching shit football for the last 15-20 years what is wrong with giving the guy his 3-4 years?

What do you have to lose?

Stop watching them if you hate him so much. 

We have not been watching shit football for 15-20 years.  It was time for Merv to leave and he couldn't get them over the hump, but he had some good years in Cincy, where there was at least some hope they'd go deep into the playoffs.  You say you'd be happy with keeping Zac just to beat the Steelers every year, yet you crap all over the playoff appearances as being more interesting/exciting for the fanbase.  Why would you give Zac 3-4 years "because there's nothing to lose" when they can make a couple of changes now and contend next year?