01-05-2021, 02:15 PM
roster D based upon performance - C or higher based upon potential when some of them first came to Bengals.
Coaching D-
front office F +
Failures of cheap and stubborn front office directly cause the low grades on personnel and coaching.
I think I have said this before but I have a close friend and client who played in the NFL as a starting guard for 9 years. He says the talent on almost all teams is nearly equivalent. He says the difference is the quality of the organization starting first and foremost with front office.
Poor practice facilities ( worse than most D 1 colleges not to mention the top 30 programs), lowest budget committed to scouting, poor draft picks, below average coaches all point to the CEO of the organization being clueless or having other agendas besides building a championship team.
Coaching D-
front office F +
Failures of cheap and stubborn front office directly cause the low grades on personnel and coaching.
I think I have said this before but I have a close friend and client who played in the NFL as a starting guard for 9 years. He says the talent on almost all teams is nearly equivalent. He says the difference is the quality of the organization starting first and foremost with front office.
Poor practice facilities ( worse than most D 1 colleges not to mention the top 30 programs), lowest budget committed to scouting, poor draft picks, below average coaches all point to the CEO of the organization being clueless or having other agendas besides building a championship team.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
