01-05-2021, 04:26 PM
(01-05-2021, 04:18 PM)Wes Mantooth Wrote: Fwiw, it supposedly accounts for quality of player too. It's represented by bubble size. (See note where they descibe it as cumalative quality of players)
I really don't know how they could calculate that (starters missed games vs backups, position value???), but they claim to. Our bubble size is definitely on the smaller size.
But that's quality of injured players, not full roster. So the Bengals lost less quality players than SF did. Is how I read that, at least. So to say that bubble size represents the Bengals as having a terrible roster across the board appears to be a false assumption based on the chart.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)