01-05-2021, 04:40 PM
(01-05-2021, 04:26 PM)MileHighGrowler Wrote: But that's quality of injured players, not full roster. So the Bengals lost less quality players than SF did. Is how I read that, at least. So to say that bubble size represents the Bengals as having a terrible roster across the board appears to be a false assumption based on the chart.
I have no clue how they came up with that part of the graph. Honestly, I think it's bs. I don't think there's anyway to designate a legitimate numerical value to that without going into each and every player and assigning an overall rank, and then also assigning position tiers as well.
I will say this, there at least right on San Fran. Anybody who thinks our injuries have been comparable (there's been quite a few who have said this) don't know a lot about their situation. The guys they lost makes ours look small by comparison. And they still won two more games than us.
