11-02-2015, 11:19 AM
(10-23-2015, 10:11 AM)djs7685 Wrote: It's a "fact" to the media and casual fans that blindly follow everything the media tells them to.
Wins are a team statistic. I have no problem saying that Andy Dalton played at an elite level against the Chargers which played a huge role in the team's victory, but the Bengals beat the Chargers, not Andy.
No one cares what you have a problem with. Just because you disagree does not mean that everyone else is "blind" or stupid.
For a very long time fans have realized that the starting QB (like the starting pitcher in a baseball game) has mor effect on which team wins than any other position. A QB can play great and the team can still lose, and a QB can play bad and the team still win, but overall the QB is the most important. I agree it is not the best way to measure a QBs play, but people are not stupid to consider it.
Do you consider all NFL owners "blind" for paying QBs a lot more money than any other position?
