Bengals should've cut ties..

[*bfine32*]

(01-11-2021, 03:29 PM)Bilbo Saggins Wrote: Because the Rams had a phenomenal run game the year that they went to the Super Bowl.  As the run game cooled, so did the entire offense.  I fail to see how a QB coach can take 100% credit for the running game and star studded defense that carried that team.  Had Goff been asked to carry the team more often that would've been a different matter.

In 3 out of the 4 post-ZT years for Tannehill, he has posted a higher Quarterback Rating than his highest rating under ZT.

Is he a passable QB coach at the NFL level?  Yah sure, he probably is.  Has he been some irreplaceable QB whisperer at any of his recent stops?  It doesn't seem to be so.

You're kinda moving targets here to fit your narrative.

As you see it:

Goff regressed because the running game declined, not because Zac left

Tannehill got better because Zac left, not because the running game improved.