01-26-2021, 03:44 AM
A lot of things to say.
Ced O is not a good comparison - Ced O was drafted because he had a five star body but film sucked.
Slater is good in the run game for college, but his style of play is consistent with players, imo, who are overfit to the college game. You don’t take that risk in the top five but I wouldn’t be surprised if he was successful.
Sewell does not lack technique, a lot of people would say he is the best ol prospect in 10 years and I would agree. Sewell is similar in some ways to Slater but has better size and strength and push.
This discussion needs to be framed as is Slater worthy of being feared in the top-5 and my issue is that I don’t see that value being there.
Ced O is not a good comparison - Ced O was drafted because he had a five star body but film sucked.
Slater is good in the run game for college, but his style of play is consistent with players, imo, who are overfit to the college game. You don’t take that risk in the top five but I wouldn’t be surprised if he was successful.
Sewell does not lack technique, a lot of people would say he is the best ol prospect in 10 years and I would agree. Sewell is similar in some ways to Slater but has better size and strength and push.
This discussion needs to be framed as is Slater worthy of being feared in the top-5 and my issue is that I don’t see that value being there.
