01-30-2021, 11:24 AM
(01-30-2021, 11:11 AM)jfkbengals Wrote: While I agree with your sentiment that we don't need him if we cover it in free agency, I would like to throw an answer to the specific scenario you have illustrated: take Sewell because we signed a RT, not a LT. I am not convinced that Williams is the answer at LT. In other words, my opinion is to sign a RT and take Sewell IF he is available. Williams can be groomed to play the right side and become tackle off the bench. Sign a proven RT AND LT in FA, then it should be all about WR or the TE from Florida.
Really?
Guy played over 600 snaps this year and had 2 penalties and gave up 3 sacks. That’s his first real season. He can and will get better.
None of that makes any sense. If they pick Sewell, that means they did not find a RT in FA. They get that, they need at least 1 guard and a better center.
Man I love Sewell. He has tremendous upside. But right now they need more help on the right side than left, and it’s possible it get addressed in FA.
