Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Daniel Brunskill C/T
#8
(02-09-2021, 05:18 PM)pulses Wrote: Problem is David Andrews isn't gonna sign for 1 or 2 million dollars. Brunskill was more for depth than starting anyways. But he can start in a pinch easily.

Looked it up and Brunskill isn't even really a free agent. He's an exclusive rights free agent. Only way he hits FA is if the 49ers don't tender him a contract at all. Even if that's the case, he's not going to sign for 1 or 2 million dollars either if he hits unrestricted free agency. Starter/high tier backup level players make more than that. Look at XSF, 2 years older, was a backup rather than a 16 game starter, and still got $2.3m and he hasn't been rated as well as Brunskill in years.

Bengals have enough guys who can "start in a pinch". They need to stop wasting money on getting loads of those guys. They need to instead invest heavily on guys who can start and make a difference as a starter.
____________________________________________________________

[Image: andrew-whitworth-with-a-nice-block-on-aj...-catch.gif]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Daniel Brunskill C/T - pulses - 02-08-2021, 06:07 AM
RE: Daniel Brunskill C/T - SunsetBengal - 02-08-2021, 08:24 AM
RE: Daniel Brunskill C/T - pulses - 02-08-2021, 07:57 PM
RE: Daniel Brunskill C/T - SunsetBengal - 02-08-2021, 08:40 PM
RE: Daniel Brunskill C/T - pulses - 02-08-2021, 08:47 PM
RE: Daniel Brunskill C/T - TheLeonardLeap - 02-09-2021, 11:48 AM
RE: Daniel Brunskill C/T - pulses - 02-09-2021, 05:18 PM
RE: Daniel Brunskill C/T - TheLeonardLeap - 02-09-2021, 05:36 PM
RE: Daniel Brunskill C/T - pulses - 02-09-2021, 09:50 PM
RE: Daniel Brunskill C/T - schroomytunes - 02-12-2021, 02:52 AM
RE: Daniel Brunskill C/T - pulses - 02-13-2021, 03:24 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)