02-13-2021, 12:18 AM
I think Lawson is the guy you pay out of the 2, but his injury history is an issue. The tag in either form creates resentment. It's still a viable option IMO. You can in no way afford to lose both players. You need to primarily build around Burrow, but the defense is deficient at multiple positions.
Semi-related question: if you as an organization feel obligated to pay top dollar for a guy like Carl Lawson but are hesitant for whatever reason, then why not direct that big money to another less risky and proven pass rusher like Barrett who has both the talent and the numbers to justify the money? I'm good with Lawson getting paid, but I think it's a valid question.
Semi-related question: if you as an organization feel obligated to pay top dollar for a guy like Carl Lawson but are hesitant for whatever reason, then why not direct that big money to another less risky and proven pass rusher like Barrett who has both the talent and the numbers to justify the money? I'm good with Lawson getting paid, but I think it's a valid question.
