02-15-2021, 03:29 AM
(02-02-2021, 02:10 AM)Jpoore Wrote: Slater is easily the more technically sound player. Sewell ur relying on upside. By that logic slater would easily be the better player day 1.I know we have a new line coach and he could help Sewell reach his potential but, with our luck, Sewell would be a complete bust and never reach anywhere near his potential.
(02-13-2021, 10:56 AM)Beaker Wrote: I like Darrisaw alot too. My dream scenario would be that someone takes Sewell ahead of us, and someone else takes a WR leaving one of the top 3 QBs on the board when our pick arrives at 5. At that point, a QB hungry team like SF (12th pick) comes to us for pick 5. We trade down, get some more picks, and take Darrisaw at 12. I would have a hard time containing an orgasm if that happened.
Last sentence made me laugh out loud
![Hilarious Hilarious](http://sportshoop.la/images/smilies/giggle.gif)
![Hilarious Hilarious](http://sportshoop.la/images/smilies/giggle.gif)
![Hilarious Hilarious](http://sportshoop.la/images/smilies/giggle.gif)
![Hilarious Hilarious](http://sportshoop.la/images/smilies/giggle.gif)
I threw out that possibility in another thread of a QB needy team offering us a lot to get their guy and then we could still get Darrisaw but he just makes me so nervous because his evaluations are either love or hate and there's no real middle ground.