Manziel starting Thursday

[*Nately120*]

(11-03-2015, 05:30 PM)reuben.ahmed Wrote: Yes, I am. Why do you insist on getting in arguments with me that you will eventually lose?

Mccown is how old again? You tell me.
How many years before he is able to make the playoffs in this division? He will be retired. Ben and Cincy aren't giving up the stronghold for at least 4-5 more years.

McCown serves no purpose. Their team is 2-6. They'd be 0-8 with Manziel (probably). The Browns franchise are perennial losers, they need to draft/retain/train.

You don't play the 'best chance to win' when you are a failure of a team.

Fault of the Browns and Manziel, that kid is on his last legs regardless. He's a twerp, he didn't have the NFL skills when he was drafted, he's learned nothing on the field and off. Nobody but the Browns would have him, and the Browns won't even have him. That team should sell themselves again.

First off, thanks for being the only person to ever give me negative rep ya jerk.

Also, McCown's age is irrelevant, and lots of QB's who are younger than the best QBs in the league right now are either on benches or have already flamed out of the league.  McCown can be 90 years old and if he is playing decent football he should start over Manziel.

For you to act like 2-6 versus 0-8 is also irrelevant because you are not a Browns fan.  Additionally, you can preach about the Browns building through the draft but they haven't drafted a decent QB since 1985.

You also say "You don't play the 'best chance to win' when you are a failure of a team." which makes no sense because McCown is a better QB than Manziel, and then you admit that the Browns likely have a worse record if Manziel starts.  McCown gives the Browns a better chance to win, so you saying they should bench him makes zero sense by your own standards, if not mine.

You completely trash Manziel but then act like the Browns should start him because McCown is 36 years old.  I guess that's all that matters.  The dude is old.  The Browns are bad.  They should make some nonsensical personnel move because "why not" it's not like people are actually held accountable for making illogical decisions in a billion-dollar industry, right?