03-06-2021, 11:04 PM
(03-06-2021, 12:00 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: What a ridiculous post. We’re not allowed to criticize an absolutely terrible player just because he’s trying to get better? Would I find anything negative wrt John Ross in your posting history even after he worked with TJ? Or is this a pick and choose kinda thing (especially if said player went to OSU).
Dude, that is some fruit that isn't even low hanging, it's rotting on the ground.. John Ross was a fraud, a complete mistake of a 1st round selection that had no drive, desire, or perceivable work ethic to do what it takes to become successful at the NFL level. His accomplishments in college came easy, because he could run in a straight line faster than other college kids he played against.
Mike Jordan is a completely different story. The guy was sort of historic in college, by starting on the OL as a true Freshman. Not only did he hold his own at LG, he got promoted to Center the next season. His film in college shows much potential. It's easily recognizable that Jordan has physical ability, game smarts, instincts, and coachability. Throwing a young, 4th round pick to fill the shoes of a seasoned veteran like Clint Boling was just assinine.
You might want to start judging players on an individual basis, before you go accusing people of having "bias" on account of where they went to school. Continuing to argue in that fashion is not only lazy on your part, but also insulting to the people you are arguing with. Just sayin'..
Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations
-Frank Booth 1/9/23