Posts: 10,718
Threads: 63
Reputation:
57608
Joined: May 2015
(03-13-2017, 05:08 PM)bengalhoel Wrote: What is this cover LB you speak about? You are telling me that LB's are supposed to cover people? So all this time that TE's and RB's are running wild across the middle of the field , there was supposed to be a Bengal covering them????????
I understand the sarcasm, but what a lot of.people dont normally understand is our linebackers are normally coverage guys. We don't use them like 3-4s to bust up the line, we use them to cover and contain. Which is why.some of our picks and pickups at lb have been confusing.
Posts: 15,001
Threads: 121
Reputation:
48097
Joined: May 2015
Location: Hyborea
(03-13-2017, 09:50 PM)Benton Wrote: I understand the sarcasm, but what a lot of.people dont normally understand is our linebackers are normally coverage guys. We don't use them like 3-4s to bust up the line, we use them to cover and contain. Which is why.some of our picks and pickups at lb have been confusing.
The problem ism our LBs typically are awful in coverage.
Posts: 15,116
Threads: 221
Reputation:
147378
Joined: May 2015
Was reading the NFL trade rumors post about Robinson's visit and saw this:
"Robinson appeared in all 16 games for the Giants and recorded 82 tackles no sacks and seven pass defenses. Pro Football Focus has him rated as the No. 78 linebacker out of 87 qualifying players."
So I guess this guy would fill a hole, but I'm not sure he's worth getting excited about. He'd be our yearly scrap heap LB, just a little younger this time.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Posts: 10,265
Threads: 180
Reputation:
24925
Joined: May 2015
(03-13-2017, 09:50 PM)Benton Wrote: I understand the sarcasm, but what a lot of.people dont normally understand is our linebackers are normally coverage guys. We don't use them like 3-4s to bust up the line, we use them to cover and contain. Which is why.some of our picks and pickups at lb have been confusing.
No
We have them play off and try to contain
Since Lamur left we don't have not a one COVERAGE linebacker.
We just put them in coverage a lot, like tards and wonder why our middle is open against every team
Posts: 1,114
Threads: 12
Reputation:
5783
Joined: Aug 2015
(03-13-2017, 09:50 PM)Benton Wrote: I understand the sarcasm, but what a lot of.people dont normally understand is our linebackers are normally coverage guys. We don't use them like 3-4s to bust up the line, we use them to cover and contain. Which is why.some of our picks and pickups at lb have been confusing.
Like James Harrison for example
Posts: 5,607
Threads: 197
Reputation:
14886
Joined: May 2015
I thought Marvin was a LB guru yet we haven't had LB's that could cover since he's been here.
Posts: 3,818
Threads: 33
Reputation:
8753
Joined: May 2015
He was arguably their best LB. Would rather keep him than JT Thomas. We all know the Bengals won't get him though. Makes too much sense.
Posts: 141
Threads: 9
Reputation:
735
Joined: May 2015
Location: The Jungle
Instantly becomes our 2nd best linebacker and opens up the draft. Would rather have him than Barwin tbh.
Posts: 36,251
Threads: 49
Reputation:
234416
Joined: May 2015
Location: Star Valley, Wyoming
Upgrade over what we saw from Dansby last year.
All for this. Robinson, Barwin and Andre would be pretty solid FA.
Posts: 1,356
Threads: 23
Reputation:
3778
Joined: May 2015
(03-13-2017, 04:52 PM)Joelist Wrote: If he really is a good cover LB who is not past his prime I'd be fine with giving up a comp pick by signing him. It would directly address the big issue in the defense of lack of speed and of LB who are not good versus the pass.
Screw the comp pick. We saw the list of comp pick busts so it wouldn't be much of a loss. Agree the Bengals LBers are suited for the slow running game, period.
Posts: 1,356
Threads: 23
Reputation:
3778
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 19,649
Threads: 633
Reputation:
85166
Joined: Oct 2016
(03-13-2017, 10:19 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Was reading the NFL trade rumors post about Robinson's visit and saw this:
"Robinson appeared in all 16 games for the Giants and recorded 82 tackles no sacks and seven pass defenses. Pro Football Focus has him rated as the No. 78 linebacker out of 87 qualifying players."
So I guess this guy would fill a hole, but I'm not sure he's worth getting excited about. He'd be our yearly scrap heap LB, just a little younger this time.
I was going to post similar. He's fast, decent in coverage. He's a horrible pass rusher and not really good against the run.
He's probably the caliber of Vinnie Ray...borderline starter but not a difference maker.
Now Minter would be an upgrade.
I like Barkin too...but he's like Harrison...built for an olb spot in a 3-4 or DE. Wasn't that good as a DE in Philly. He's a name though.
Posts: 19,649
Threads: 633
Reputation:
85166
Joined: Oct 2016
(03-13-2017, 11:20 PM)BengalFanInNJ Wrote: He was arguably their best LB. Would rather keep him than JT Thomas. We all know the Bengals won't get him though. Makes too much sense.
He graded out as their worst LB by PFF.
Google his name and profootball focus grades and you'll see a bunch of results showing how he graded bottom 5 on their defense in a lot of games.
Posts: 14,152
Threads: 501
Reputation:
106706
Joined: May 2015
(03-13-2017, 04:32 PM)phil413 Wrote: Solid player but he wasn't cut, so I think he'd have to get paid less than peko so they don't negate a high pick that whit or zeitler gets them.
Don't forget, they lost Sexy, too....
Posts: 13,643
Threads: 366
Reputation:
45874
Joined: May 2015
And Hunt.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
Quote:"Success doesn’t mean every single move they make is good" ~ Anonymous
"Let not the dumb have to educate" ~ jj22
Posts: 40,628
Threads: 1,062
Joined: May 2015
(03-13-2017, 10:19 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Pro Football Focus has him rated as the No. 78 linebacker out of 87 qualifying players."
(03-15-2017, 11:35 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: He graded out as their worst LB by PFF.
Google his name and profootball focus grades and you'll see a bunch of results showing how he graded bottom 5 on their defense in a lot of games.
PFF keeps track of some interesting stats, but their individual rankings are a complete joke. In 2015 They had Kirk[atrick rated as the 115th CB worse than a bunch of scrubs that barely played when in fact he was atop 30 CB better than half the starting CBs in the league.
Posts: 19,649
Threads: 633
Reputation:
85166
Joined: Oct 2016
(03-16-2017, 10:05 AM)fredtoast Wrote: PFF keeps track of some interesting stats, but their individual rankings are a complete joke. In 2015 They had Kirk[atrick rated as the 115th CB worse than a bunch of scrubs that barely played when in fact he was atop 30 CB better than half the starting CBs in the league.
They do...and for what it's worth I think he'd be a nice addition here. You need role players out there too and he would address our pass coverage from the LB spot. He's Vinnie Ray level talent.
His play on the field kind of reminds me of Emmanual Lamur.
IF we add a guy like Rueben Foster in the draft...he'd fit very well with Burfict and Foster. Those 2 would address the pass rushing deficiency.
It's when we try to put guys in roles that they aren't suited for that we have issues.
Overall, I think Minter is the best fit. Then probably Robinson. Then Barwin. (Barwin is suited for the 3-4 and struggled as a DE. We'd have to use him in pass rush situations here for him to succeed.)
Posts: 2,343
Threads: 14
Reputation:
7714
Joined: Oct 2016
(03-16-2017, 10:05 AM)fredtoast Wrote: PFF keeps track of some interesting stats, but their individual rankings are a complete joke. In 2015 They had Kirk[atrick rated as the 115th CB worse than a bunch of scrubs that barely played when in fact he was atop 30 CB better than half the starting CBs in the league.
This is fake news. Kirkpatrick was garbage that year. Improved last year. So I'll give him that.
Posts: 15,116
Threads: 221
Reputation:
147378
Joined: May 2015
(03-16-2017, 10:05 AM)fredtoast Wrote: PFF keeps track of some interesting stats, but their individual rankings are a complete joke. In 2015 They had Kirk[atrick rated as the 115th CB worse than a bunch of scrubs that barely played when in fact he was atop 30 CB better than half the starting CBs in the league.
I don't know if I'd use that example to prove PFF's rankings are a "complete joke". Wasn't DreKirk among the top 3 most penalized CB's that year? He wasn't all that in coverage, either. He improved a LOT last year. If DreKirk graded that poorly for 2016, I'd agree with you. 2015 - while a bit harsh - isn't all that far off IMO.
----------------------------------------------
I just had a thought. What if the Robinson and Minter visits are meant to give the appearance that LB is a dire need, making other teams think we'll draft Reuben Foster when we actually have someone else in mind?
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Posts: 3,818
Threads: 33
Reputation:
8753
Joined: May 2015
(03-15-2017, 11:35 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: He graded out as their worst LB by PFF.
Google his name and profootball focus grades and you'll see a bunch of results showing how he graded bottom 5 on their defense in a lot of games.
Go on any Giants boards and you will see a majority of them want Robinson to stay because he was the best they had.
|
