Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise › Cincinnati Bengals / NFL › JUNGLE NOISE v
Stock Market "Buy" signals - 2016 deficiencies seem Upgraded in most areas for 2017
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Stock Market "Buy" signals - 2016 deficiencies seem Upgraded in most areas for 2017
Luvnit2 Offline
Living Legend
*

Club Wyche
Posts: 11,927
Threads: 713
Reputation: 55173
Joined: Jun 2015

#21
08-10-2017, 10:43 PM
(08-10-2017, 12:44 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: According to Hobspin. Please stop spreading that lie. We've seen how in the past that's not always as exactly the same as they have claimed.

Unless they offered a $5m signing bonus, they didn't offer the exact same 2017 money. If the Rams cut him after 2017, he walks away with $12.5m. That's not the exact same money as offering a guy a 1yr/$9m deal with $0 signing bonus and $0 guaranteed money.

Actually had a conversation with  former Bengals OL who told us Whittworth turned down the Bengals guaranteed 1 year deal that was a little higher than the Rams 2017 offer, but he wanted a 2 year deal and Bengals would not do a 2 year deal due to his age. What is your scource?
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
2024 may go on record as one of most underperforming teams in Bengal history. Bengal's FO has major work to do on defensive side of the ball. I say tag and trade Tee Higgins in 2025 to start with the rebuild.
Find
Reply/Quote
THE PISTONS Offline
Living Legend
*

Club Esiason
Posts: 19,733
Threads: 634
Reputation: 85904
Joined: Oct 2016

#22
08-10-2017, 10:45 PM
(08-10-2017, 10:43 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Actually had a conversation with  former Bengals OL who told us Whittworth turned down the Bengals guaranteed 1 year deal that was a little higher than the Rams 2017 offer, but he wanted a 2 year deal and Bengals would not do a 2 year deal due to his age. What is your scource?

I read something similar too. They offered him a 1 year deal for somewhere around the Rams offer...but wouldn't go to 2 years.
Find
Reply/Quote
*Nate (formerly eliminate08)* Offline
CamCat Club - HOF Member
*

Hall of Fame
Posts: 36,522
Threads: 49
Reputation: 236280
Joined: May 2015
Location: Star Valley, Wyoming

#23
08-11-2017, 12:24 PM
(08-10-2017, 10:43 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Actually had a conversation with  former Bengals OL who told us Whittworth turned down the Bengals guaranteed 1 year deal that was a little higher than the Rams 2017 offer, but he wanted a 2 year deal and Bengals would not do a 2 year deal due to his age. What is your scource?

(08-10-2017, 10:45 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: I read something similar too. They offered him a 1 year deal for somewhere around the Rams offer...but wouldn't go to 2 years.

Heard this as well and makes me think they didn't want to pizz off Whit by franchise tagging him either.

This way he had a shot at a multiple year deal. MB and company are loyal to players like Whit and you don't want to stifle
the man if he gets a better deal elsewhere. No point bringing the man back if he is angry.

They might of made the right decision, sure as hell hope so and Og plays decent.
Find
Reply/Quote





Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)