Draft/FA positional value?

[*ochocincos*]

(02-16-2018, 01:47 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Ok, I can agree with that.  I thought you were stating how the Bengals viewed positional value.  

Yea I guess I admittedly did a mix of both. They needed a dominant LB (typically at WILL) based on their longtime scheme that mimicked the early-2000's TB teams.
And they don't necessarily NEED a dominant TE, as they went years and years without one and still put up numbers because of very good WR1, WR2, and/or RB.
Need for a guy like Eifert only magnified when the blocking scheme forced a bad run game and then a lack of receiving talent once Jones and Sanu left.

But based on your feedback, I've moved TE1 up into the same tier as WILL, as it probably should be.