Roster Surprises the Rest of the Way?

[Mike M (the other one)]

(08-29-2018, 09:37 AM)MentalRage Wrote: Seems like everyone thinks I'm wrong about the Elliot/Bullock situation so I can admit that I am probably wrong lol

You're not alone.
I would've kept Elliot as well. He gives us a bigger field to get points on.
Accuracy % isn't the be all end all, and it can be manipulated by one player getting harder shots than the other.

How many points did each guy earn for their team?
Elliot 117
Bullock 85

That's a difference of 32, spread a few of those out amongst some of games, and our win-loss record could change.

[Sled21]

(08-29-2018, 05:20 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: You're not alone.
I would've kept Elliot as well. He gives us a bigger field to get points on.
Accuracy % isn't the be all end all, and it can be manipulated by one player getting harder shots than the other.

How many points did each guy earn for their team?
Elliot 117
Bullock 85

That's a difference of 32, spread a few of those out amongst some of games, and our win-loss record could change.

That's a lame way of looking at it. Otherwise, the guy who's team can't score and always has to settle for a field goal is always going to look better than they guy who kicks mostly extra points.....

[fredtoast]

(08-29-2018, 05:20 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: I would've kept Elliot as well. He gives us a bigger field to get points on.

Not true.  Elliot reduces our chances of getting points inside the 30.