Posts: 14,295
Threads: 294
Reputation:
31588
Joined: May 2015
I don't put a ton of stock in these kind of speculative articles, but this one suggests trading him to the Bills for Shaq Lawson.. I dunno about this . What say ye?
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2793891-nfl-trades-that-need-to-happen-early-in-2018-season#slide0
Do we even need another DE?
In the immortal words of my old man, "Wait'll you get to be my age!"
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse, but the one comfort we have is Cincinnati sounds worse. ~Oliver Wendal Holmes Sr.
Posts: 4,829
Threads: 107
Reputation:
22659
Joined: May 2015
Location: An undisclosed biological research facility
Nope. With our O line probs thats the last position group they should think about trading a guy from. Besides that, D line is probably our strongest position group. If you trade, you do so to strengthen a weak spot, not weaken a weak spot and overstock an already strong one.
Posts: 2,980
Threads: 26
Reputation:
8443
Joined: Aug 2015
Interesting. I kinda like it, but I don't see that ever going down.
![[Image: tumblr_nmz43uky8c1rtim7ko1_500.gif]](https://38.media.tumblr.com/25816a6cb529d6664fefa984e543e20d/tumblr_nmz43uky8c1rtim7ko1_500.gif)
Feel free to support my Film/TV Review YouTube Channel - Youtube.Com/NaterTot
Posts: 614
Threads: 7
Reputation:
3128
Joined: Jan 2016
Who comes up with this stuff? Between Willis and Lawson Dunlap MJ and Hubbard we are set at DE. You know where we aren't? Guard.
Posts: 14,152
Threads: 501
Reputation:
106706
Joined: May 2015
I wouldn't trade him. I think he really was set back by his illness. The guy still has potential and provides quality depth.
Posts: 2,980
Threads: 26
Reputation:
8443
Joined: Aug 2015
(09-05-2018, 06:32 PM)Brimey Wrote: Who comes up with this stuff? Between Willis and Lawson Dunlap MJ and Hubbard we are set at DE. You know where we aren't? Guard.
Truth. Especially with that position in question. Odd choice. Then again, it IS BR.
Feel free to support my Film/TV Review YouTube Channel - Youtube.Com/NaterTot
Posts: 3,160
Threads: 70
Reputation:
15749
Joined: May 2015
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Westerman should be starting. If the Bengals trade him for Lawson, a guy that will be thrown into an already THICK defensive line with Dunlap, Lawson, Hubbard, Willis, and Johnson, then they deserve to be criticized for a terrible move.
While I like Lawson, the Bengals already have arguably a top 5 defensive line in the NFL.
While they also have arguably a bottom 5 offensive line.
Posts: 19,254
Threads: 239
Reputation:
179683
Joined: May 2015
We could trade for Bodine and move Price to RT? You know, it's really not out of the realm of possibilities with this team. 
Posts: 16,239
Threads: 256
Reputation:
186297
Joined: May 2015
Location: Ohio
I can't imagine the Bengals would consider this for more than one second before saying no.
Posts: 8,232
Threads: 130
Reputation:
54392
Joined: May 2015
Location: Cincinnati
We need MORE OL depth, not LESS.
Posts: 13,732
Threads: 368
Reputation:
46410
Joined: May 2015
We are too unsettled on the line to trade someone like Westerman.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
Quote:"Success doesn’t mean every single move they make is good" ~ Anonymous
"Let not the dumb have to educate" ~ jj22
Posts: 2,082
Threads: 28
Reputation:
9723
Joined: May 2015
Location: North Appalachia
In a world where one or two of your guards may be able to play tackle at a higher level than your backup tackles, I don't think that you go around trading your backup guards. Especially not for d-ends who may not be any better than who you already have. The added 6th rounder that this guy throws in in his hypothetical scenario is just the icing on the stupidity cake.
Posts: 8,821
Threads: 219
Reputation:
29988
Joined: May 2015
Location: Fredericksburg Virginia
Posts: 405
Threads: 3
Reputation:
2221
Joined: Jun 2015
(09-05-2018, 06:32 PM)Brimey Wrote: Who comes up with this stuff? Between Willis and Lawson Dunlap MJ and Hubbard we are set at DE. You know where we aren't? Guard.
No feces, am I right?
Posts: 38,949
Threads: 922
Reputation:
132533
Joined: May 2015
Are folks really saying "no" to a Westerman for Shaq Lawson trade?
Say yes in about 1 second, cut MJ, promote Lundblake
Posts: 40,628
Threads: 1,062
Joined: May 2015
(09-05-2018, 10:54 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Are folks really saying "no" to a Westerman for Shaq Lawson trade?
Say yes in about 1 second, cut MJ, promote Lundblake
MJ had more sacks than Shaq last year.
Posts: 614
Threads: 7
Reputation:
3128
Joined: Jan 2016
(09-05-2018, 10:54 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Are folks really saying "no" to a Westerman for Shaq Lawson trade?
Say yes in about 1 second, cut MJ, promote Lundblake
Lawson has been a bust.
Posts: 8,511
Threads: 28
Reputation:
96810
Joined: May 2015
(09-05-2018, 08:04 PM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: We need MORE OL depth, not LESS.
This x100
The water tastes funny when you're far from your home,
yet it's only the thirsty that hunger to roam.
Roam the Jungle !
Posts: 14,295
Threads: 294
Reputation:
31588
Joined: May 2015
Like I said I don't put much stock in these kinds of speculative articles ,especially this one..
I just happened to run across it and thought, WTF was the writer thinking ?
If they were to trade him at all it wouldn't be for DE.. A offensive tackle perhaps, but not a DE..
In the immortal words of my old man, "Wait'll you get to be my age!"
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse, but the one comfort we have is Cincinnati sounds worse. ~Oliver Wendal Holmes Sr.
Posts: 16,948
Threads: 419
Reputation:
97015
Joined: May 2015
Put the crack pipe down.... 
|
![[Image: Mx7IB2.png]](http://i.cubeupload.com/Mx7IB2.png)
![[Image: oN5QAdY.png]](https://i.imgur.com/oN5QAdY.png)
