Posts: 1,289
Threads: 22
Reputation:
7245
Joined: Jan 2019
(08-14-2019, 06:40 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: If there's really anything to Driskel playing WR, or contributing in multiple ways, we should see something in "live action" as soon as tomorrow evening.
Just watch the Saints game from last year.
He's not picking this up from scratch, he's been working at this for awhile now.
Posts: 1,754
Threads: 0
Reputation:
7034
Joined: Mar 2017
(08-14-2019, 06:28 PM)XenoMorph Wrote: we are going to be talking about the last guy at his spot.... 6th or 7th WR.... who is not likely to see the field much on offense at all.. and most his work will be done on Special teams.
If driskel can gun and block better on STs than and has the upside of emergency qb… that would raise his value over a guy that would be inactive on game days cause he doesn't play special teams.
That 6th and 7th guy will most likely be Stanley Morgan and Auden Tate both have flashed already at WR we could need these guys on the field at some point this year since our base offense runs 3 WR unlike years past when we ran 2 WR base offense and 2 TE.
Posts: 5,685
Threads: 4
Reputation:
21955
Joined: Dec 2018
The next Wes Welker!!!!!!
Posts: 25,840
Threads: 650
Reputation:
243154
Joined: May 2015
Location: Jackson, OH
(08-14-2019, 06:44 PM)NKURyan Wrote: Just watch the Saints game from last year.
He's not picking this up from scratch, he's been working at this for awhile now.
Umm, Thanks. But, I'd rather not...
Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations
-Frank Booth 1/9/23
Posts: 11,960
Threads: 103
Reputation:
81482
Joined: May 2015
(08-14-2019, 10:34 AM)Bengalitis Wrote: Ross is shaking in his boots knowing Driskel is now a hybrid WR/QB.
Really? Every thread? Every single mother ***** thread?
1
Posts: 11,477
Threads: 19
Reputation:
78962
Joined: May 2015
Location: Where Mr. Kotter was before returning
(08-14-2019, 02:58 AM)Bengalitis Wrote: So this definitely means ROSS will be playing QB now.
Nope... Linebacker.
I'm gonna break every record they've got. I'm tellin' you right now. I don't know how I'm gonna do it, but it's goin' to get done.
- Ja'Marr Chase
April 2021
Posts: 11,477
Threads: 19
Reputation:
78962
Joined: May 2015
Location: Where Mr. Kotter was before returning
(08-14-2019, 05:43 PM)XenoMorph Wrote: Don't you forget Kumerow….!!!!
Simonise had a good run too!!!
I'm gonna break every record they've got. I'm tellin' you right now. I don't know how I'm gonna do it, but it's goin' to get done.
- Ja'Marr Chase
April 2021
Posts: 7,831
Threads: 3
Reputation:
13213
Joined: Sep 2016
Location: BurningArizona
(08-14-2019, 08:02 PM)McC Wrote: Really? Every thread? Every single mother ***** thread?
Every time I get the opportunity, I will oblige.
Posts: 2,343
Threads: 14
Reputation:
7714
Joined: Oct 2016
(08-14-2019, 08:02 PM)McC Wrote: Really? Every thread? Every single mother ***** thread?
Fake news. There’s no mention of Ross in the Ware thread. Well not yet at least.
Posts: 11,960
Threads: 103
Reputation:
81482
Joined: May 2015
(08-14-2019, 09:06 PM)Bengalitis Wrote: Every time I get the opportunity, I will oblige.
So, your stated intent is to irritate.
You might want to see someone about that creepy obsession.
Posts: 7,831
Threads: 3
Reputation:
13213
Joined: Sep 2016
Location: BurningArizona
(08-14-2019, 10:46 PM)McC Wrote: So, your stated intent is to irritate.
You might want to see someone about that creepy obsession.
Nah..if I'm obsessed, I'm with Boyd. From the shadows to being #1 receiver in the team now. He is A M A Z I N G !!!!
Posts: 18,677
Threads: 463
Reputation:
119184
Joined: May 2015
Location: Nashville, TN
(08-14-2019, 06:38 PM)SHRacerX Wrote: I meant as a WR...Did you know that Tannehill played WR in college?
Yes I did, I just assumed you were talking about QB since that's what both have played in the NFL.
Apologies for the assumption.
Zac Taylor 2019-2020: 6 total wins
Zac Taylor 2021-2022: Double-digit wins each season, plus 5 postseason wins
Zac Taylor 2023: 9 wins despite losing Burrow half the season
Zac Taylor 2024: Started 1-4. If he can turn this into a playoff appearance, it will be impressive.
Sorry for Party Rocking!
Posts: 18,677
Threads: 463
Reputation:
119184
Joined: May 2015
Location: Nashville, TN
(08-14-2019, 06:19 PM)bengalfan74 Wrote: That's the thing about all this. Does it knock a better WR, RB, TE or whatever off the team, is it really worth it ?
Related note: I would be ok if the team went with just 3 TEs with Auden Tate as an extra receiver. Tate is a good blocker, has great mitts, and he can high point well. I could see Tate even following Darren Waller's path of eventually converting to TE. Waller came into the league as a big WR in 2015 but started his conversion to TE last year when Oakland picked him off Baltimore's PS. I've liked what I've seen from Tate over the likes of Schreck, Carter, and Franks.
Zac Taylor 2019-2020: 6 total wins
Zac Taylor 2021-2022: Double-digit wins each season, plus 5 postseason wins
Zac Taylor 2023: 9 wins despite losing Burrow half the season
Zac Taylor 2024: Started 1-4. If he can turn this into a playoff appearance, it will be impressive.
Sorry for Party Rocking!
Posts: 11,617
Threads: 131
Reputation:
59095
Joined: May 2015
(08-15-2019, 09:11 AM)ochocincos Wrote: Related note: I would be ok if the team went with just 3 TEs with Auden Tate as an extra receiver. Tate is a good blocker, has great mitts, and he can high point well. I could see Tate even following Darren Waller's path of eventually converting to TE. Waller came into the league as a big WR in 2015 but started his conversion to TE last year when Oakland picked him off Baltimore's PS. I've liked what I've seen from Tate over the likes of Schreck, Carter, and Franks.
I actually think Driskell's ability to cover punts makes it more likely Tate can make the roster as a WR. Normally you need your last WR to play special teams but that isn't really Tate's thing. There is no reason to move the guy to TE, he has been fine when given the chance as a WR. What the guys needs are more chances, hopefully we see more of those chances while AJ is out.
Posts: 18,677
Threads: 463
Reputation:
119184
Joined: May 2015
Location: Nashville, TN
(08-15-2019, 09:15 AM)Au165 Wrote: I actually think Driskell's ability to cover punts makes it more likely Tate can make the roster as a WR. Normally you need your last WR to play special teams but that isn't really Tate's thing. There is no reason to move the guy to TE, he has been fine when given the chance as a WR. What the guys needs are more chances, hopefully we see more of those chances while AJ is out.
Being at WR is fine, I just think he needs to make the roster. Between the WRs and TEs, I'd go:
WRs - Green, Boyd, Ross, Malone, Erickson, Tate, Morgan/Willis/Core
TEs - Eifert, Uzomah, Sample
I think the WRs have performed better than the TEs after Sample. My thought was that if the Bengals wanted to go 4th TE as insurance for injuries, I think Tate could fill in as an emergency TE due to his skill set and size, and I think he has the frame to actually grow into a full-fledged TE.
Zac Taylor 2019-2020: 6 total wins
Zac Taylor 2021-2022: Double-digit wins each season, plus 5 postseason wins
Zac Taylor 2023: 9 wins despite losing Burrow half the season
Zac Taylor 2024: Started 1-4. If he can turn this into a playoff appearance, it will be impressive.
Sorry for Party Rocking!
Posts: 16,414
Threads: 151
Reputation:
61627
Joined: May 2015
(08-15-2019, 10:13 AM)ochocincos Wrote: Being at WR is fine, I just think he needs to make the roster. Between the WRs and TEs, I'd go:
WRs - Green, Boyd, Ross, Malone, Erickson, Tate, Morgan/Willis/Core
TEs - Eifert, Uzomah, Sample
I think the WRs have performed better than the TEs after Sample. My thought was that if the Bengals wanted to go 4th TE as insurance for injuries, I think Tate could fill in as an emergency TE due to his skill set and size, and I think he has the frame to actually grow into a full-fledged TE.
Tate wouldn't be able to block like a TE though...
Keep Shreck as 4th TE.
Posts: 13,471
Threads: 132
Reputation:
89628
Joined: May 2015
(08-15-2019, 09:15 AM)Au165 Wrote: I actually think Driskell's ability to cover punts makes it more likely Tate can make the roster as a WR. Normally you need your last WR to play special teams but that isn't really Tate's thing. There is no reason to move the guy to TE, he has been fine when given the chance as a WR. What the guys needs are more chances, hopefully we see more of those chances while AJ is out.
I remember reading that Tate is getting time with the first team special teams.
I just dont see a spot for Driskel on the 53 at WR and he cant go on a practice squad.
Posts: 1,340
Threads: 1
Reputation:
5599
Joined: Aug 2018
Ah Driskel...can we just not cut the guy and get this over with?
Fredtoast + Ignore = Forum bliss
Posts: 14,152
Threads: 501
Reputation:
106706
Joined: May 2015
(08-15-2019, 09:11 AM)ochocincos Wrote: Related note: I would be ok if the team went with just 3 TEs with Auden Tate as an extra receiver. Tate is a good blocker, has great mitts, and he can high point well. I could see Tate even following Darren Waller's path of eventually converting to TE. Waller came into the league as a big WR in 2015 but started his conversion to TE last year when Oakland picked him off Baltimore's PS. I've liked what I've seen from Tate over the likes of Schreck, Carter, and Franks.
Interesting point, as I believe Taylor's offense is much more predicated on the use of WRs than TEs...(more 11 personnel than 12).
That being said, I doubt they would go with three TEs given Eifert's injury history. Even if you could pluck one off your PS, I still would be surprised if it happened. Good point, though.
Posts: 7,831
Threads: 3
Reputation:
13213
Joined: Sep 2016
Location: BurningArizona
Keeping Driskel for the sake of trick plays is very concerning. How many trick plays can you pull in a single game? On top of that, the number of penalties we have so far, I don't think we are ready for trick plays yet.
|