Posts: 1,069
Threads: 21
Joined: May 2015
http://espn.go.com/nfl/powerrankings/_/year/2015/week/8
Funny when you consider Bengals were 5th last week and rose to 3 after a bye week. Last week the Cards were 4th after a loss and dropped to 6th this week after a win.
ESPN is just making this stuff up.
Posts: 25,844
Threads: 650
Reputation:
243245
Joined: May 2015
Location: Jackson, OH
(10-27-2015, 06:24 PM)WhoDeyWho Wrote: http://espn.go.com/nfl/powerrankings/_/year/2015/week/8
Funny when you consider Bengals were 5th last week and rose to 3 after a bye week. Last week the Cards were 4th after a loss and dropped to 6th this week after a win.
ESPN is just making this stuff up.
Just like CFB rankings. They pump teams up, so that it makes for a better TV matchup.
Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations
-Frank Booth 1/9/23
Posts: 6,055
Threads: 2
Reputation:
14393
Joined: May 2015
Location: The Queen City
ESPN had this team ranked 5th? Seriously?
 
Other than the Pack, Pats, and I presume Broncos, who else did they have in front of the Bengals?
Edit Nevermind.
Posts: 421
Threads: 10
Reputation:
1180
Joined: May 2015
(10-27-2015, 07:44 PM)Atomic Orange Wrote: ESPN had this team ranked 5th? Seriously?
Other than the Pack, Pats, and I presume Broncos, who else did they have in front of the Bengals?
It's cumulative scores amongst panelists, starting over from scratch, thus the stupid variation week to week.
NFL.com has one guy doing the rankings, he has to explain the moves every week as they compare to the previous week. A little more logic to it, but not as much collaborative input.
That said, who cares? Rank them 32nd every week.
Posts: 4,779
Threads: 110
Reputation:
9494
Joined: Sep 2015
We are ranked #2 on Bleacher report 
Posts: 6,055
Threads: 2
Reputation:
14393
Joined: May 2015
Location: The Queen City
(10-27-2015, 07:49 PM)TGISunday Wrote: It's cumulative scores amongst panelists, starting over from scratch, thus the stupid variation week to week.
NFL.com has one guy doing the rankings, he has to explain the moves every week as they compare to the previous week. A little more logic to it, but not as much collaborative input.
That said, who cares? Rank them 32nd every week.
Ahh, thanks for explaining that. The truth is i only watch ESPN when they have a game on anymore. FWIW IMO the team at this point in time should be ranked #2.
Posts: 14,152
Threads: 501
Reputation:
106706
Joined: May 2015
(10-27-2015, 06:24 PM)WhoDeyWho Wrote: http://espn.go.com/nfl/powerrankings/_/year/2015/week/8
Funny when you consider Bengals were 5th last week and rose to 3 after a bye week. Last week the Cards were 4th after a loss and dropped to 6th this week after a win.
ESPN is just making this stuff up.
How were the Cards 4th after getting beat by a team with a backup QB?
Posts: 3,827
Threads: 36
Reputation:
21840
Joined: May 2015
They're ranked #1 in the heart of Johnny Cupcakes, which is all that really matters.
Posts: 14,730
Threads: 2,120
Reputation:
82906
Joined: May 2015
Next week we'll still be 3rd with the winner of the Packers-Broncos game getting 2nd. Unless of course MIami does the impossible and beats New England on Thursday
Winning makes believers of us all
Posts: 405
Threads: 3
Reputation:
2221
Joined: Jun 2015
(10-27-2015, 08:31 PM)pally Wrote: Next week we'll still be 3rd with the winner of the Packers-Broncos game getting 2nd. Unless of course MIami does the impossible and beats New England on Thursday
There is a possibility there. For some reason they have been pretty hot as of the last 2 weeks.
Posts: 1,178
Threads: 3
Reputation:
3746
Joined: Aug 2015
(10-27-2015, 09:13 PM)PAjwPhilly Wrote: For some reason they have been pretty hot as of the last 2 weeks.
Having a coach worth playing for who knows their shit can do that.
Posts: 8,131
Threads: 130
Reputation:
53426
Joined: May 2015
Location: Cincinnati
One more bye week and we'll be up to #1.
Posts: 7,135
Threads: 50
Reputation:
49019
Joined: May 2015
(10-27-2015, 08:07 PM)SHRacerX Wrote: How were the Cards 4th after getting beat by a team with a backup QB?
It's funny, because at least two of the voters wrote articles saying the same thing. The Steelers actually dropped a spot from 9th to 10th after beating the Cardinals, while the Cards moved up 2 spots from 6th to 4th. It made zero sense, and I'm sure the editors told the voters to pull their heads out of their asses.
Posts: 889
Threads: 36
Reputation:
5042
Joined: May 2015
Location: California
(10-27-2015, 06:47 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Just like CFB rankings. They pump teams up, so that it makes for a better TV matchup.
Take it easy tiger.
Posts: 334
Threads: 4
Reputation:
1678
Joined: May 2015
We had a better bye week than the Broncos!
Posts: 14,152
Threads: 501
Reputation:
106706
Joined: May 2015
(10-27-2015, 09:13 PM)PAjwPhilly Wrote: There is a possibility there. For some reason they have been pretty hot as of the last 2 weeks.
You can be a hot mess and still beat the Texans and Titans.
Posts: 614
Threads: 6
Reputation:
2612
Joined: May 2015
(10-27-2015, 08:10 PM)Johnny Cupcakes Wrote: They're ranked #1 in the heart of Johnny Cupcakes, which is all that really matters.
And if Johnny says it is so, then I say it is so. 
Posts: 16,414
Threads: 151
Reputation:
61627
Joined: May 2015
(10-27-2015, 06:24 PM)WhoDeyWho Wrote: http://espn.go.com/nfl/powerrankings/_/year/2015/week/8
Funny when you consider Bengals were 5th last week and rose to 3 after a bye week. Last week the Cards were 4th after a loss and dropped to 6th this week after a win.
ESPN is just making this stuff up.
ESPN has been very reluctant to rank us higher....
|
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
![[Image: oyb7yuz66nd81.jpg]](https://i.redd.it/oyb7yuz66nd81.jpg)
![[Image: oN5QAdY.png]](https://i.imgur.com/oN5QAdY.png)
