11-02-2019, 04:37 PM
(11-02-2019, 02:28 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Yep, can't make this stuff up.
If I am a hypocrite for arguing Kenum was not better than Dalton just because he had better stats and at the same time saying Dalton had a better game than Brissett because he had better stats what does that say about you?
You tried to argue that Kenum was better than dalton because he had better stats, but then said Dalton's better stats didn't prove he had a better game than Brissett
Seems to me that makes you just as big of a hypocrite as me. Or should I say
THAT MAKES YOU JUST AS BIG OF A HYPOCRITE AS ME!!!!!!!
Please explain to the listening audience how me saying Keenum was playing better "THIS YEAR", turns into 'case keenum is a better QB' by you and why i should defend that position that you created.
Hopefully, these posts, in order, will help you to understand the Dalton game V Brissett game in question.
Pay close attention to the words i use. Playing a better game and having better stats are 2 different things.
http://thebengalsboard.com/Thread-Dalton-is-broken?pid=774070#pid774070
And here you are, twisitng and changing what i said to fit the argument you want to disprove. I never said Brissett's stats were better than Dalton's.
http://thebengalsboard.com/Thread-Dalton-is-broken?pid=774342#pid774342
And here's....well, i don't really know what this is, but i'll add my reply to it afterward.
http://thebengalsboard.com/Thread-Dalton-is-broken?pid=774470#pid774470
My reply.
http://thebengalsboard.com/Thread-Dalton-is-broken?pid=774536#pid774536
With that, it's just about time for me and my boy to go see Zombieland: Double Tap.
Peace out.
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."