The PI review continues to be a joke.

[*michaelsean*]

This isn’t an anti-Ravens post they just happen to be the most recent benefactors of the latest joke that is the NFL. If there wasn’t PI against Hopkins in the 1st qtr in the end zone, then PI doesn’t exist.

[6andcounting]

That was more egregious and obvious than the bang-bang play that forced the league to make PI reviewable.

[jfkbengals]

(11-17-2019, 03:27 PM)michaelsean Wrote: This isn’t an anti-Ravens post they just happen to be the most recent benefactors of the latest joke that is the NFL. If there wasn’t PI against Hopkins in the 1st qtr in the end zone, then PI doesn’t exist.

So video evidence of tackling the receiver prematurely is NOT confirmation of no foul?

[cinci4life]

(11-17-2019, 03:27 PM)michaelsean Wrote: This isn’t an anti-Ravens post they just happen to be the most recent benefactors of the latest joke that is the NFL. If there wasn’t PI against Hopkins in the 1st qtr in the end zone, then PI doesn’t exist.

Yeah if there was ever a non call that would be overturned it was that one. That was PI on so many levels and not getting overturned just shows there was no point in allowing challenges for PI. Complete joke.

[treee]

Yep that was pretty obvious PI.

[6andcounting]

Anything short of taking the receiver's helmet and beating him over the head with it isn't going to draw a flag via challenge review.

[cinci4life]

So they just called Houston for DPI because there was a very light shove by the defender but somehow a tug of a jersey and a bear hug isn't DPI. SMFH