Poll: Which Pass Blocking Strategy do you prefer?
This poll is closed.
Retreat and "catch"
15.00%
3 15.00%
Meet and Defeat
85.00%
17 85.00%
Total 20 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Poll: Pass Blocking Strategy
#21
(12-09-2020, 07:26 PM)Joelist Wrote: There is one more element - if the lineman is engaged in blocking he is not illegally downfield. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ineligible_receiver_downfield

Thanks, good catch.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations

-Frank Booth 1/9/23
Reply/Quote
#22
(12-09-2020, 03:23 PM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: I'm not an evaluator of Olines in any way, but I've always thought the "meet and defeat" approach was more for run blocking than pass blocking. I've very rarely, if ever, seen an offensive lineman step forward on a pass blocking rep (outside of aggressive play action roll outs maybe), at least not as far as I can remember.

I have no problem with a blocking strategy that creates a pocket via "retreating". Our big problem is the guys are not "catching" the defender after they retreat. They just let them whip past them.
This. Apparently the majority of Bengal Olinemen lack the strength needed to retreat 2-3 steps, catch and that's as far as they go. Thus, protecting the QB.

They all seem to just keep getting pushed into the QBs lap.

Not telling y'all anything you can't already see...

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
The only thing I hate worse than Pittsburgh football...

...is Pittsburgh fans!!


SLIM--gone, but never forgotten...

Original Bengals message boards
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,124
Rep Points: 4726

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#23
When everyone says Sewell is cant miss...what if he doesnt fit in a passive scheme.
Reply/Quote





Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)