Let’s Compare

[Isaac Curtis: The Real #85]

(12-28-2021, 09:43 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: Probably the same ones saying we haven't seen enough to know if Chase was the right pick for this team. 

We haven't.   

Prefering Sewell was never about Chase being poor.  It was obvious he was gonna be good, and he has been better than good.  Deservedly a pro-bowler despite some costly drops (Chargers, + 1 more, Bears game?).  

The idea is that you can very good/great WRs later in round 1.  Jefferson was picked in the 20s, for instance.  Whilst generational OTs rarely last past 10.  

Of course, Sewell has yet to rise to a pro-bowl level. That has to happen before this is even a discussion.  

Those that advocated trading back for more picks might have had the best call.  I wouldn't mind Slater + Parsons.  

Carman instead of Creed Humphrey is the real boner pick, however.

[*SHRacerX*]

(12-28-2021, 06:27 PM)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: We haven't.   

Prefering Sewell was never about Chase being poor.  It was obvious he was gonna be good, and he has been better than good.  Deservedly a pro-bowler despite some costly drops (Chargers, + 1 more, Bears game?).  

The idea is that you can very good/great WRs later in round 1.  Jefferson was picked in the 20s, for instance.  Whilst generational OTs rarely last past 10.  

Of course, Sewell has yet to rise to a pro-bowl level. That has to happen before this is even a discussion.  

Those that advocated trading back for more picks might have had the best call.  I wouldn't mind Slater + Parsons.  

Carman instead of Creed Humphrey is the real boner pick, however.

Preferring Sewell was a lack of understanding of weapons on offense.  I'm done.   Not going to respond to any more of this crap about Chase.  If people still don't see it....

[NUGDUKWE]

(12-28-2021, 02:36 PM)Wyche Wrote: Just think if we don't have a rash of turnovers in a few games. I think the players lost at least two games, maybe 3 if you count GB.

I know everybody puts the Chicago loss to Burrow because he did have 3 picks. But it was a weird game from the beginning because our underneath checkdown routes literally went to a spot and stood still and the Chicago players just stood right with them and we didn't adjust and that led to some of the turnovers. I think the GB game we win if were aggressive on our last possession. I'll give you the Chargers game that one we just turned the ball over too much.

[t3r3e3]

(12-28-2021, 09:32 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: If they beat KC, he is Coach of the Year.  I don't know who else would deserve it.  

Matt LaFleur

[Essex Johnson]

ZT and front office has had three good drafts and effective FA picks, the idea Taylor has talent so that is why we might be winning w.ell duh, we have talent because of ZT.. so maybe unsure

Is Burrow going to be performing like he did with boyd, state, Morgan as WRs, no so of course you need some talent to win ... besides Higgins and Chase have Taylor influence in those major 2 picks.

[Soonerpeace]

The reason they took Chase over Sewell is that Sewell’s blocking scheme in college was different and they felt they needed someone (Chase) who would have a more immediate impact. Rookie tackles often take some adjusting. But they felt either pick would work. They had Jonah Williams and Reiff .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Soonerpeace]

(12-28-2021, 08:20 PM)t3r3e3 Wrote: Matt LaFleur

He’s the favorite as he should be.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[*SHRacerX*]

(12-28-2021, 08:20 PM)t3r3e3 Wrote: Matt LaFleur

Pfffftttttt....

The leader of a team that is run by Captain Covid Toe?  

Good season, but hardly exceeding expectations.