Posts: 40,628
Threads: 1,062
Joined: May 2015
Anytime you look at a sample set of games that includes zero losses you are going to get a higher percentage of runs. Numbers are somewhat skewed because in a lot of these games the winning team was working the clock late in the game by running the ball.
I'd like ot see the ratio for the first half of all these games.
Posts: 15,116
Threads: 221
Reputation:
147378
Joined: May 2015
(01-17-2022, 10:41 AM)fredtoast Wrote: Anytime you look at a sample set of games that includes zero losses you are going to get a higher percentage of runs. Numbers are somewhat skewed because in a lot of these games the winning team was working the clock late in the game by running the ball.
I'd like ot see the ratio for the first half of all these games.
I'm not jumping through your hoop.
You made the accusation (that these stats are skewed), so the onus is on you to prove it.
I thought PFR did first/second half splits, but couldn't find it on my phone. That said, just looking at halves with no other context would prove nothing. The vast majority of these 33 games were close enough that the winning team wouldn't be going ultra conservative for the entire 2nd half anyway. Or at all.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Posts: 40,628
Threads: 1,062
Joined: May 2015
(01-17-2022, 04:37 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: I'm not jumping through your hoop.
I did not mean for you to.
I looked to see if I could find them before I made that comment.
Posts: 15,116
Threads: 221
Reputation:
147378
Joined: May 2015
(01-17-2022, 04:52 PM)fredtoast Wrote: I did not mean for you to.
I looked to see if I could find them before I made that comment.
I guess even PFR has it's limitations.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.