Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Taylor vs McVay
#1
So what are the affects, if any, of these 2 being so familiar with one another? Could we have a scenario like the 2002 Raiders vs Bucs SB, where it was obvious Gruden knew everything the Raiders were doing?

Is our offense/verbiage all that similar to what the Rams run?

Could it be an advantage for us? Or a disadvantage? This was one of the first things I thought about when I knew we might face the Rams, but I haven't seen anyone (even in media) talk about it yet.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Reply/Quote
#2
If there’s an advantage, I think it’s ours (and I think it’s small). McVay is a known commodity to Taylor and in general, and that relationship is not bi-directional. Taylor has been a part of McVay’s game planning process, but McVay has never been a part of Taylor’s game planning process.

I’m not sure the offensive similarities go much farther than heavy emphasis on 11 personnel anyway. That connection likely goes beyond just offensive philosophy — both teams field great WR trios and will of course put them on the field frequently.
Reply/Quote
#3
Another cool bit is that, Taylor-McVay connection aside, this is a Super Bowl matchup of two of the youngest head coaches in the league.

Experience shmexperience
Reply/Quote
#4
There’s also another connection with Callahan having been Stafford’s QB coach for a couple years in Detroit.
[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSEYP058YrTmvLTIxU4-rq...pMEksT5A&s]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

Reply/Quote
#5
Taylor was McVay's QB coach, while Mcvay was Taylor's Head Coach. I think that means Taylor has greater insight into how McVay thinks than the other way around.
Reply/Quote





Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: