Posts: 15,116
Threads: 221
Reputation:
147378
Joined: May 2015
So what are the affects, if any, of these 2 being so familiar with one another? Could we have a scenario like the 2002 Raiders vs Bucs SB, where it was obvious Gruden knew everything the Raiders were doing?
Is our offense/verbiage all that similar to what the Rams run?
Could it be an advantage for us? Or a disadvantage? This was one of the first things I thought about when I knew we might face the Rams, but I haven't seen anyone (even in media) talk about it yet.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Posts: 1,013
Threads: 35
Reputation:
9268
Joined: Apr 2021
If there’s an advantage, I think it’s ours (and I think it’s small). McVay is a known commodity to Taylor and in general, and that relationship is not bi-directional. Taylor has been a part of McVay’s game planning process, but McVay has never been a part of Taylor’s game planning process.
I’m not sure the offensive similarities go much farther than heavy emphasis on 11 personnel anyway. That connection likely goes beyond just offensive philosophy — both teams field great WR trios and will of course put them on the field frequently.
Posts: 1,013
Threads: 35
Reputation:
9268
Joined: Apr 2021
Another cool bit is that, Taylor-McVay connection aside, this is a Super Bowl matchup of two of the youngest head coaches in the league.
Experience shmexperience
Posts: 28,187
Threads: 353
Reputation:
242590
Joined: Aug 2016
There’s also another connection with Callahan having been Stafford’s QB coach for a couple years in Detroit.
Posts: 16,948
Threads: 419
Reputation:
97015
Joined: May 2015
Taylor was McVay's QB coach, while Mcvay was Taylor's Head Coach. I think that means Taylor has greater insight into how McVay thinks than the other way around.