Posts: 8,216
Threads: 97
Reputation:
22044
Joined: Nov 2015
(04-11-2022, 11:05 PM)Emeritus Wrote: 
In history this has been a tough topic for Bengal fans and for the city to face. With the topic to become more relevant in the coming years I thought maybe its time for discussion. I don't know many workings on the deal between the county and the team but what I do know is that a lease is coming up. I also know that any team with this current roster and how they continue to build will be head over heels attractive to other cities. Lets look at this from a wide view of the regional relevancy. A move of that capacity brings $$$$$..... I mean a retractable roof stadium . Its thirty or more cities that are ready. Is Cincy ready for that? If you think Jerry's world was big there will be cities and global ready to build for "The Family"
It means nothing to most now but it will soon.
20 years is a thought and 5 is a blink.
I don;t think we will be going retractable.. from article below, i think with the positive inspection on PB.. we will renovate
https://www.wcpo.com/news/local-news/i-team/paul-brown-stadium-should-bengals-build-a-new-stadium-instead-of-renovating-the-old-one
Posts: 938
Threads: 195
Joined: Jan 2016
(05-04-2022, 07:26 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: I don;t think we will be going retractable.. from article below, i think with the positive inspection on PB.. we will renovate
https://www.wcpo.com/news/local-news/i-team/paul-brown-stadium-should-bengals-build-a-new-stadium-instead-of-renovating-the-old-one
I'm not sure what the best outcome is in this scenario because the organization is in a position of power now with both the taxpayers and the decision makers in Cincinnati. The renovations will costs upwards of a half a billion over time coming out of a lease in 2026 which a presidential election is in two years. No politics just reference to time flying. I'm really 60/40 now that these numbers have come out so I'm personally pro new stadium for future revenue to the team and city." Slightly" I can also understand both sides of the argument when you look at inflation currently and the unknown factors of time itself. Its a fascinating debate that goes on in many cities for various reasons. They say that winning cures everything so its nice to get the practice facilities upgraded to a championship level. At least the business relationship between the team and the city seems to be working and fluid. Go Bengals!
Posts: 17,081
Threads: 237
Reputation:
133328
Joined: Oct 2015
(05-05-2022, 12:42 AM)Emeritus Wrote:
I'm not sure what the best outcome is in this scenario because the organization is in a position of power now with both the taxpayers and the decision makers in Cincinnati. The renovations will costs upwards of a half a billion over time coming out of a lease in 2026 which a presidential election is in two years. No politics just reference to time flying. I'm really 60/40 now that these numbers have come out so I'm personally pro new stadium for future revenue to the team and city." Slightly" I can also understand both sides of the argument when you look at inflation currently and the unknown factors of time itself. Its a fascinating debate that goes on in many cities for various reasons. They say that winning cures everything so its nice to get the practice facilities upgraded to a championship level. At least the business relationship between the team and the city seems to be working and fluid. Go Bengals!
They are?
Say the city tells Mike Brown no. What's he going to do? The relocation fee for the teams moving to LA were $550m each. Is there even anywhere that is willing to pay 100% of the cost of giving Mike Brown a new stadium? Say he moves to a new city, and for the sake of conversation they agree to pay $850m of a new $1.4b stadium (the very deal that Buffalo just gave the Bills). That means Mike Brown is out $550m for his share of the new stadium and $550m for his relocation fee.
He's now spending $1.1b on moving and the city if Cincinnati sells the naming rights of Paul Brown Stadium and it becomes Paul Brown's Viagra Dong Medicine Stadium. Did he win? Can he even afford $1.1b to move the team to a new city and new stadium without losing controlling interest in the Bengals? I don't think he can.
____________________________________________________________
Posts: 8,764
Threads: 219
Reputation:
29729
Joined: May 2015
Location: Fredericksburg Virginia
(05-04-2022, 06:33 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Well that renovation would have to include Natural Grass
Yep
Posts: 4,745
Threads: 698
Reputation:
8749
Joined: May 2015
Location: Springfield, Ohio
(04-12-2022, 12:47 PM)J24 Wrote: Its going to be Renovated for the world cup in 2026 at the very least. No it won't be a dome!
I hope they get a roof, cold games are absolutely miserable
Posts: 17,081
Threads: 237
Reputation:
133328
Joined: Oct 2015
(05-05-2022, 02:33 AM)Trademark Wrote: I hope they get a roof, cold games are absolutely miserable
Then prepare to get (rightfully) absolutely blasted by the rest of the AFCN rightfully for being soft, being the Southern-most team in the division yet the only team in the division with a roof.
There are 20 open fields, 5 retractable roofs, and 5 domes in the NFL.
Also... probably never going to happen in Cincinnati because playing out in the cold still has Dan Fouts' being a grumpy little B to this day and all the olds love that as they reminisce.
____________________________________________________________
Posts: 938
Threads: 195
Joined: Jan 2016
(05-05-2022, 01:18 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: They are?
Say the city tells Mike Brown no. What's he going to do? The relocation fee for the teams moving to LA were $550m each. Is there even anywhere that is willing to pay 100% of the cost of giving Mike Brown a new stadium? Say he moves to a new city, and for the sake of conversation they agree to pay $850m of a new $1.4b stadium (the very deal that Buffalo just gave the Bills). That means Mike Brown is out $550m for his share of the new stadium and $550m for his relocation fee.
He's now spending $1.1b on moving and the city if Cincinnati sells the naming rights of Paul Brown Stadium and it becomes Paul Brown's Viagra Dong Medicine Stadium. Did he win? Can he even afford $1.1b to move the team to a new city and new stadium without losing controlling interest in the Bengals? I don't think he can.
After all this time of making team friendly deals for his organization after losing year after year.. Your now suggesting to me that Mikey can't get a deal with the county or another city for what he wants. After making an improbable run to a SB that energized a region! If you weren't laughing you'd be serious.
Posts: 17,081
Threads: 237
Reputation:
133328
Joined: Oct 2015
(05-05-2022, 09:48 PM)Emeritus Wrote:
After all this time of making team friendly deals for his organization after losing year after year.. Your now suggesting to me that Mikey can't get a deal with the county or another city for what he wants. After making an improbable run to a SB that energized a region! If you weren't laughing you'd be serious.
It's a different time now from when the Paul Brown Stadium deal was made. Here's the NFL stadiums opened since 2010 by % of total cost being publicly funded...
Rams/Chargers: 0%
Jets/Giants: 0%
49ers: 9%
Falcons: 17%
Raiders: 38%
Vikings: 45%
...Mike Brown is going to have to pony up huge amounts of money if he wants a new stadium. If he wants to move, he'll have to pony up even more, so that threat rings hollow. Having a good run for 1 year out of 31 doesn't suddenly give you "a position of power" to get hundreds of millions/a billion dollars from taxpayers.
Nobody is going to look at the 11yr/$110b TV rights deal they just signed and think "oh hey, these guys need OUR tax dollars". That's not even counting all their tickets, merchandise, concessions, gambling money, sponsorships (the NFL got $1.8b in sponsorship money in 2021)...
In 2001, the NFL had about ~$4b in revenue. In 2019, that number was ~$16b, before the new $10b/yr TV rights deal. The tolerance for paying for stadiums for a league that will be raking in WELL OVER $25b/yr in revenue by 2023 is small and getting smaller every year.
____________________________________________________________
Posts: 7,110
Threads: 49
Reputation:
48719
Joined: May 2015
(05-05-2022, 10:47 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: It's a different time now from when the Paul Brown Stadium deal was made. Here's the NFL stadiums opened since 2010 by % of total cost being publicly funded...
Rams/Chargers: 0%
Jets/Giants: 0%
49ers: 9%
Falcons: 17%
Raiders: 38%
Vikings: 45%
...Mike Brown is going to have to pony up huge amounts of money if he wants a new stadium. If he wants to move, he'll have to pony up even more, so that threat rings hollow. Having a good run for 1 year out of 31 doesn't suddenly give you "a position of power" to get hundreds of millions/a billion dollars from taxpayers.
Nobody is going to look at the 11yr/$110b TV rights deal they just signed and think "oh hey, these guys need OUR tax dollars". That's not even counting all their tickets, merchandise, concessions, gambling money, sponsorships (the NFL got $1.8b in sponsorship money in 2021)...
In 2001, the NFL had about ~$4b in revenue. In 2019, that number was ~$16b, before the new $10b/yr TV rights deal. The tolerance for paying for stadiums for a league that will be raking in WELL OVER $25b/yr in revenue by 2023 is small and getting smaller every year.
The Raiders are also a historically a cash poor team and had no issues coming up with their share of the stadium funds or relocation fees. The other owners also go a lot easier on the cash poor teams when it comes to those relocation fees. The Raiders paid half of what you're talking. Not to mention that Brown could just build the stadium across the river or in another Ohio county and avoid relocation fees altogether while depriving Hamilton County of the tax revenue from the team and it's employees. Team revenue is also going to jump with the new tv deal and he could sell minority shares(which would be a hot commodity right now) if he desperately needed quick cash. Brown isn't stuck, by any stretch.
It isn't going to come to that, though. He doesn't want to move and the county doesn't want him to move. Both parties have been working on an agreeable split of costs for awhile now.
Posts: 17,081
Threads: 237
Reputation:
133328
Joined: Oct 2015
(05-05-2022, 11:34 PM)Whatever Wrote: The Raiders are also a historically a cash poor team and had no issues coming up with their share of the stadium funds or relocation fees. The other owners also go a lot easier on the cash poor teams when it comes to those relocation fees. The Raiders paid half of what you're talking. Not to mention that Brown could just build the stadium across the river or in another Ohio county and avoid relocation fees altogether while depriving Hamilton County of the tax revenue from the team and it's employees. Team revenue is also going to jump with the new tv deal and he could sell minority shares(which would be a hot commodity right now) if he desperately needed quick cash. Brown isn't stuck, by any stretch.
It isn't going to come to that, though. He doesn't want to move and the county doesn't want him to move. Both parties have been working on an agreeable split of costs for awhile now.
Where would work? Newport/Covington is in no position to pay hundreds of millions/a billion dollars to anyone. Newport has a population of 14,000 people, Covington has 41,000. What other county in Ohio (that wouldn't be encroaching on the Browns) could afford to pay hundreds of millions/a billion dollars for a football stadium? One of the typical ways they raise money for a stadium is increasing sales tax, and increasing hotel taxes. Clermont/Butler/Warren county couldn't possibly create enough revenue through those means to cover that kind of money or have the infrastructure to support having visitors.
I did mention his only real answer to getting out is selling shares, which is lessening his (and his family's) control on the team. He's been spending years buying out minority owners to put the team more under their complete control, so he'd basically be just removing decades of his work.
The "position of power" that was claimed just isn't really so. He's a little late to be getting leverage by threatening to move. Where would he actually go? San Diego? St Louis? Neither of those places wanted to build stadiums for their previous not-Mike-Brown-owned teams. LA and Vegas were the big threatened locations the NFL used, and now they're used up. He's not going to get the outrageous sweetheart deal he got last time, there would be literal riots in Cincinnati. It's a different time.
____________________________________________________________
Posts: 938
Threads: 195
Joined: Jan 2016
(05-04-2022, 07:26 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: I don;t think we will be going retractable.. from article below, i think with the positive inspection on PB.. we will renovate
https://www.wcpo.com/news/local-news/i-team/paul-brown-stadium-should-bengals-build-a-new-stadium-instead-of-renovating-the-old-one
Just give me what you would so for a new Bengals stadium.
Posts: 14,281
Threads: 294
Reputation:
31560
Joined: May 2015
(04-19-2022, 12:11 PM)MTBengalsFan Wrote: This discussion sure confirms why Montana has but 1.1 million people as the 4th largest state.
I've lived in Montana..it ain't Cincinnati and darn sure isn't a big NFL destination unless it's for retired players and coaches to go hunting, fishing and being cold..
Is there some big debate in Darby about building a 300 fan stadium for the next Jacksonville jags team?
In the immortal words of my old man, "Wait'll you get to be my age!"
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse, but the one comfort we have is Cincinnati sounds worse. ~Oliver Wendal Holmes Sr.
|
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
![[Image: image.gif.f0c2fdfbee928741dbfa5ce1eccafe9a.gif]](https://dtb3yzl0vm3pr.cloudfront.net/monthly_2023_09/image.gif.f0c2fdfbee928741dbfa5ce1eccafe9a.gif)
