01-06-2023, 01:21 AM
Trade for some of that popcorn ?
*waggles whisky bottle seductively*
Sent from my SM-S515DL using Tapatalk
*waggles whisky bottle seductively*
Sent from my SM-S515DL using Tapatalk
We got hosed.
|
01-06-2023, 01:21 AM
Trade for some of that popcorn ?
*waggles whisky bottle seductively* Sent from my SM-S515DL using Tapatalk
1
01-06-2023, 01:22 AM
(01-06-2023, 01:16 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Ok, i just re-read it a bit closer. I'm wrong too, stating number 1 seed. Sorry for coming off so strong, and then stating something wrong myself in my comment.
1
01-06-2023, 01:23 AM
Let’s just say the following happens.
Chiefs lose/Bills lose we win, take care of Baltimore and then again 6-8 days later. We go to orchard park and finish what we started AFCCG rematch. It’s neutral. Who is the “home team”? You have 130,000+ season ticket members in this case. How does it get divided up? Would it be a chiefs home game in Indy (making up the city), made up of primarily chiefs fans? Would it be half and half like the Super Bowl/NCAA bowl games?
01-06-2023, 01:23 AM
01-06-2023, 01:33 AM
(01-06-2023, 12:15 AM)Mickeypoo Wrote: I am firmly reverting back to my "give each team an hour to compose themselves and then get your asses back on the field or forfeit the game" opinion. I wish Mickeypoo had been in charge of our team Monday night at the time of Commodio Coitus incident instead of Ol' Softie, Zac Taylor.
"Knowledge is preferable to ignorance. Better by far to embrace the hard truth than a reassuring fable. "
---CARL SAGAN
01-06-2023, 01:35 AM
(01-06-2023, 01:23 AM)Bengalbug Wrote: Let’s just say the following happens. So if we win and the Bills lose(both end up 12-4), we don't get the #2 seed? Shouldn't we host them in the divisional round under that scenario? I thought we had SOV tiebreaker over the bastards.
"Knowledge is preferable to ignorance. Better by far to embrace the hard truth than a reassuring fable. "
---CARL SAGAN
01-06-2023, 01:36 AM
(01-06-2023, 01:35 AM)Science Friction Wrote: So if we win and the Bills lose, we don't get the #2 seed? You’re right. I think?
01-06-2023, 01:40 AM
Hey Bengals fans, Chiefs fan here. Agree you are getting hosed. Thing that makes no sense is why you would go to Buffalo rather than a neutral if teams win out, which is likely. The cancellation cost your shot at the 2, which every Chiefs fan I know believe you were going to get in that game Monday night., and especially after those first 10 minutes. We were all assuming 1. Chiefs 2. Bengals 3. Bills, and Chiefs vs Bengals rematch in the AFCCG.
From a selfish perspective, I believe the Chiefs are better off playing the Bills on a neutral than Cinci in arrowhead. The Bills D is depleted. I think you still probably win at Buffalo but it's completely inconsistent with the rest of the agreement that you play there. We've been prepping ourselves for losing the bye, so I know how unfair this feels for you all, especially since Taylor conceded to not completing the Monday game. If it stands I hope you guys prevail in Buffalo (actually think the Pats have a shot there) and we see you for the rematch. Assuming the Chiefs beat the Raiders the rematch was going to be in arrowhead anyway, so in that scenario things work out in the end. Just would like to see this feel more fair to all the teams than it does now. Maybe they figure this part out in the final vote.
1
01-06-2023, 01:42 AM
The bromance between us and Buffalo is over come Sunday. There is going to be a lot of Patriot fans around here. :)
01-06-2023, 01:42 AM
(01-06-2023, 01:23 AM)Bengalbug Wrote: Let’s just say the following happens. In this scenario we would be the #2 seed and Buffalo would come here. We still would have tiebreaker over them. Should we then play KC it would be at a neutral site.
1
01-06-2023, 01:48 AM
(01-06-2023, 01:21 AM)Rotobeast Wrote: Trade for some of that popcorn ? DONE!! "The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
01-06-2023, 01:48 AM
I'd rather play at Buf or KC than a neutral site. I understand that this make wins less likely. I'm tired of any fans (except Steelers fans) losing out so that the NFL can sell more tickets at a neutral site. Not all fans can travel. As far as I can tell, all of these compromises mean the Bengals fans lose even more home games than the one they already have.
01-06-2023, 01:50 AM
(01-06-2023, 01:42 AM)cinci4life Wrote: In this scenario we would be the #2 seed and Buffalo would come here. We still would have tiebreaker over them. Should we then play KC it would be at a neutral site. I thought this was the case. Thanks for the clarification. GO PATRIOTS !!!!!
"Knowledge is preferable to ignorance. Better by far to embrace the hard truth than a reassuring fable. "
---CARL SAGAN
01-06-2023, 01:50 AM
So as I understand it, the owners are voting on these proposals tomorrow? If they vote no, do they have a backup solution, or is this pretty much already agreed upon?
01-06-2023, 01:51 AM
(01-06-2023, 01:50 AM)sloSTI Wrote: So as I understand it, the owners are voting on these proposals tomorrow? If they vote no, do they have a backup solution, or is this pretty much already agreed upon? Sounds like they agreed to them already. Vote is probably a formality.
"Knowledge is preferable to ignorance. Better by far to embrace the hard truth than a reassuring fable. "
---CARL SAGAN
01-06-2023, 01:51 AM
(01-06-2023, 01:23 AM)Bengalbug Wrote: Let’s just say the following happens. Bengals are #2 and Bills come back to cincy and then an AFCCG is on a neutral site vs KC. "The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
01-06-2023, 01:53 AM
(01-06-2023, 01:48 AM)puddycat Wrote: I'd rather play at Buf or KC than a neutral site. I understand that this make wins less likely. I'm tired of any fans (except Steelers fans) losing out so that the NFL can sell more tickets at a neutral site. Not all fans can travel. As far as I can tell, all of these compromises mean the Bengals fans lose even more home games than the one they already have. Paul Brown’s legacy is in cincy. They never liked Paul Brown They wanted to ban the use of the no huddle offense when the bengals made the super bowl in 1988
01-06-2023, 01:58 AM
(01-06-2023, 12:02 AM)motoarch Wrote: We only controlled it if we had won. It was half way through the first quarter and your treating if as of the game was out of reach. The Bills secondary lost 2 more players (Hyde already out and other CB White is not 100% back from knee surgery. Can you honestly believe Burrow at home against that secondary h does not put up at least 35 points. Bengals did get screwed and common sense tells us why. 2024 may go on record as one of most underperforming teams in Bengal history. Bengal's FO has major work to do on defensive side of the ball. I say tag and trade Tee Higgins in 2025 to start with the rebuild.
01-06-2023, 02:05 AM
I'm feeling as angry and frustrated as my guy, Mr. Turner :
[video=youtube]http://[/video]
"Knowledge is preferable to ignorance. Better by far to embrace the hard truth than a reassuring fable. "
---CARL SAGAN
01-06-2023, 02:05 AM
(01-06-2023, 12:18 AM)Bengalbug Wrote: Well, to be fair…one bills game was played in Detroit. If Buffalo was smart and had a dome stadium, game would have been played in Buffalo. Their loss of a home game is 100% on them. 2024 may go on record as one of most underperforming teams in Bengal history. Bengal's FO has major work to do on defensive side of the ball. I say tag and trade Tee Higgins in 2025 to start with the rebuild.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|