04-12-2023, 04:47 PM
I think it gets announced around 6-8 pm tonight. I can feel it...all the way down in ma plums.
The boys are just talkin' ball, babyyyy
Higgins signs new deal?
|
04-12-2023, 04:47 PM
I think it gets announced around 6-8 pm tonight. I can feel it...all the way down in ma plums.
The boys are just talkin' ball, babyyyy
04-12-2023, 04:52 PM
1
04-12-2023, 04:55 PM
(04-09-2023, 05:26 PM)Tony Wrote: https://twitter.com/zimwhodey/status/1645094146795884547?s=19 My reading of subsequent Zim posts is that in claiming the "deal is done," he is saying agreement has been reached by both parties , but he is not saying the contract has been signed (i.e., finalized). Zim states he has no timetable on when the signing would happen. I imagine that most of the big names (Adam Schefter, etc.) would not say anything until the agreement was actually signed. i
04-12-2023, 05:12 PM
(04-12-2023, 04:55 PM)Nepa Wrote: My reading of subsequent Zim posts is that in claiming the "deal is done," he is saying agreement has been reached by both parties , but he is not saying the contract has been signed (i.e., finalized). Zim states he has no timetable on when the signing would happen. I imagine that most of the big names (Adam Schefter, etc.) would not say anything until the agreement was actually signed. There have been announcements of parties reaching a deal in principle before. Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations -Frank Booth 1/9/23
1
04-12-2023, 06:07 PM
Mama Higgins not hearing #2 talk.
1
04-12-2023, 06:20 PM
(04-12-2023, 06:07 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: Mama Higgins not hearing #2 talk. I would agree You can’t be a number 2 of you are getting doubled while the number 1 is there. At that point he’s a 1B
-Housh
04-12-2023, 06:29 PM
(04-12-2023, 06:07 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: Mama Higgins not hearing #2 talk. Not hearin' that shit lol
04-12-2023, 06:35 PM
(04-12-2023, 06:07 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: Mama Higgins not hearing #2 talk. Well...technically he's not even the #1 receiver in his family. Rashard is older than Tee lol.
04-12-2023, 06:36 PM
(04-12-2023, 06:20 PM)Housh Wrote: I would agree B, the 2nd letter of the alphabet. ____________________________________________________________
04-12-2023, 07:53 PM
1
04-12-2023, 08:34 PM
If Darius Slay wants to say the Eagles don’t have a #2, then neither do the Bengals. I’d personally take Tee over D. Smith. Or at least rank them pretty close.
04-12-2023, 08:50 PM
(04-12-2023, 08:34 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: If Darius Slay wants to say the Eagles don’t have a #2, then neither do the Bengals. I’d personally take Tee over D. Smith. Or at least rank them pretty close. I tend to shy away from using Philadelphians as role models or justification. That's a quick path to booing Santa, throwing batteries at people, and rioting/eating horse poop. Both are clearly the #2 on their teams. There's a reason why one guy on each team is getting All-Pro 2nd Team nods, multiple Pro Bowl nods, and superior stats and the others have none, none, and lesser. Doesn't mean they aren't very good at football or could potentially be a #1 elsewhere, but there's not two #1s on a team. Same with Tyreek Hill/Jaylen Waddle. ____________________________________________________________
04-12-2023, 09:09 PM
(04-12-2023, 08:50 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: I tend to shy away from using Philadelphians as role models or justification. That's a quick path to booing Santa, throwing batteries at people, and rioting/eating horse poop. I think Devonta Smith is a high end 2. Waddle I think is a 1, and he proved that his rookie year but when it comes to this subject it's mainly subjective It's because you are of such profound wisdom, Frank Booth. - SunsetBengal
04-12-2023, 09:09 PM
(04-12-2023, 08:50 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: I tend to shy away from using Philadelphians as role models or justification. That's a quick path to booing Santa, throwing batteries at people, and rioting/eating horse poop. That’s the thing though, I guess it depends on just how many other teams a guy would be the #1 on. If it’s half the teams in the league you can kind of make a case.
04-12-2023, 09:15 PM
Katie will tell us soon or not! She may just tell you at 3am. Thats just the Katie I love.
04-12-2023, 09:18 PM
(04-12-2023, 09:09 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: That’s the thing though, I guess it depends on just how many other teams a guy would be the #1 on. If it’s half the teams in the league you can kind of make a case. Except at the end of the day, if the answer on the team you're on is "no" then you're still a #2 until you go to one of those other teams. The 2018 Chargers would have been Division Champs in 4 other divisions that year with their record... but they weren't Division Champs because there was a better team in their own Division. Doesn't mean their division that year had 2 Division Champs, just meant the Chargers were a 2nd place team in their division. ____________________________________________________________
04-12-2023, 09:32 PM
(04-12-2023, 09:18 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Except at the end of the day, if the answer on the team you're on is "no" then you're still a #2 until you go to one of those other teams. The 2018 Chargers would have been Division Champs in 4 other divisions that year with their record... but they weren't Division Champs because there was a better team in their own Division. Doesn't mean their division that year had 2 Division Champs, just meant the Chargers were a 2nd place team in their division. Not sure that’s really a great comparison. The standings are the standings, and ranking WR’s is much more subjective. I’m fine with calling Tee a high end #2 though. I just thought Slay’s reply to that tweet opened up the door to debate it wrt the Bengals.
04-12-2023, 10:02 PM
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|