Chase Young

[J24]

He seems like a guy that's market will be underwhelming for him come March and I wonder If the FO would be interested in signing him to a cheap one year rental(relatively speaking; anything from 15 to 20 M would be cheap)or sign him to a deal like the packers did with Rashan Gary(4 yr, 96 M, 35M guaranteed). Which would be under his preferred market price.(I think his asking price will be 30M a year to start out!)

[kalibengal]

(01-21-2024, 12:04 PM)J24 Wrote: He seems like a guy that's market will be underwhelming for him come March and I wonder If the FO would be interested in signing him to a cheap one year rental(relatively speaking Iwould anything from 15 to 20 M) or sign him to a deal like the packers did with Rashan  Gary(4 yr, 96 M, 37 guaranteed). Which would be under his preferred market price.(I think his asking price will be 30M a year to start out!

They should have just signed Clowney...he seems alot more productive
How does Young not impress with all the talent he is surrounded by in SF? thats a red flag 
Id rather them go after Josh Allen from JAGs 

[The D.O.Z.]

(01-21-2024, 01:54 PM)kalibengal Wrote: They should have just signed Clowney...he seems alot more productive
How does Young not impress with all the talent he is surrounded by in SF? thats a red flag 
Id rather them go after Josh Allen from JAGs 

Right?! He showed out a bit his rookie year, got hurt, then disappeared. On a Washington DL stacked with talent too. Then goes to SF and still is JAG. Disappointing for sure. Makes you wonder how much he has between the ears, honestly.

[*bfine32*]

Just bring back The Law Dog

[casear2727]

(01-21-2024, 01:54 PM)kalibengal Wrote: They should have just signed Clowney...he seems alot more productive
How does Young not impress with all the talent he is surrounded by in SF? thats a red flag 
Id rather them go after Josh Allen from JAGs 

Surely the Jags tag Allen, he is a stud.

[Destro]

Chase Young is not that good. Likely bust.

[Frank Booth]

he is no good

[jj22]

He's not break the bank good..... But he can be a rotational piece for a rotational piece price.

[Whatever]

Young has 16.5 sacks in 4 years. He's coming off a respectable 7.5 this year. Hubbard, by comparison, had 6 last year.

I don't see it as a fit, honestly. The Bengals aren't going to sign an edge rusher to a big contract a year after Murphy led all rookie DE's in pass rush win %. Young is going to want a starter job and salary and would likely be a rotational piece, here.

[*jason*]

I hate to knock one of my OSU boys, but Chase Young is loafing...

[*ochocincos*]

While I know he didn't start with SF after being traded, I wouldn't think he'd be ok for his first big contract to take a rotational backup role.
I would have to imagine he'll wanna go wherever gives him the chance to start or play a large number of snaps.
He's not getting that in CIN.

[007BengalsFan]

(01-30-2024, 06:22 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: he is no good

I wouldnt say he is no good.  He may not be elite but he is far from being a bad DE or a bust.  He is better than Hubbard and 3 years younger.  

Having said that, I dont see us signing Young.  He will want more than he is worth with a market value based more on hype than actual production.  It reminds me of some fans clamoring for a 9 million dollar Noah Fant when he has had back to back 400+ yard seasons with zero TDs this year.  Just not worth the cost of what they would bring to the team.