Tee vs a NEW D

[Essex Johnson]

Todays gsme reinforced my believe keep Tre over Tee, u csnt keep both, tre is more important

[J24]

(7 hours ago)Essex Johnson Wrote: Todays gsme reinforced my believe keep Tre over Tee, u csnt keep both, tre is more important

You have to be a bot?

[Nicomo Cosca]

I’m so conflicted.

[NUGDUKWE]

(Yesterday, 07:48 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: Yea but the point is those teams never had issues moving on from their receivers(Diggs, Tyreek, Hollywood Brown)

I would point all those teams QBs run as part of they're offense. Mahommes may not run quite as much but get him in the playoffs and he runs alot. The amount of money the Bengals appear to have seems that they should be able to sign they're guys and get 1 or 2 guys in FA. Then yes you have to draft well but you have to do that if you let Tee walk. Nothing is guaranteed but why add another ? to the one unit on your team that is good enough to win it all.

[Frank Booth]

(6 hours ago)NUGDUKWE Wrote: I would point all those teams QBs run as part of they're offense. Mahommes may not run quite as much but get him in the playoffs and he runs alot. The amount of money the Bengals appear to have seems that they should be able to sign they're guys and get 1 or 2 guys in FA. Then yes you have to draft well but you have to do that if you let Tee walk. Nothing is guaranteed but why add another ? to the one unit on your team that is good enough to win it all.

you know whats guaranteed? Tee leaving 3 games early and missing 5 outright