01-14-2016, 12:49 AM
I will be buying a lot of Burfict jerseys......
F the NFL
F the NFL
When i Win the POWERBALL/ i have 132 chances
|
01-14-2016, 12:49 AM
I will be buying a lot of Burfict jerseys......
F the NFL
01-14-2016, 12:52 AM
Bootleg I hope, or that money will be going right into the NFL's pockets...
Well does he have a name or should I call him... lawyer?
01-14-2016, 12:55 AM
(01-14-2016, 12:49 AM)Alleyviper13 Wrote: I will be buying a lot of Burfict jerseys...... If it goes a few more weeks you could buy the Bengals.
01-14-2016, 09:24 AM
I'd buy the Bengals team, then give every fan a Burfict jersey that they are required to wear during each game.
The away team will be required to sit on a bench that has painted #55 on it. Away team fans must yell "Entering Vontaze Burfict territory" before sitting in their seat or their ticket is forfeited.
#FIRELOU
01-14-2016, 12:04 PM
Could always buy one of these!
01-14-2016, 07:59 PM
Did you purchase 132 lottery tickets?
Some advice for lottery players, Buying a few dozen or a few hundred tickets will not increase your chances of winning. Unless you purchase a few hundred million tickets, your chances are just as good if you only purchase one ticket. By spending $132 on lottery tickets, you've successfully increased your chances of winning by about .000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001%. You're chances prolly ain't even that good. Save your money next time and only buy one ticket or at most, one random number and one number you choose.
-That which we need most, will be found where we want to visit least.-
01-14-2016, 08:07 PM
01-14-2016, 08:25 PM
If I was the sole winner of the Powerball, I would have tried to buy majority ownership of the Steelers.
1st Day: "I think Ben is washed up, so I called this press conference to announce we'll be trading him to the CFL Hamilton Tiger-Cats for Zach Collaros." 2nd Day: "We're moving on from Mike Tomlin. I've been talking to Marty Morningweg and I have convinced him to give the NFL another shot." 3rd Day: "I was reading Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, so now I am banning Terrible Towels from the stadium due to the possibility of them being used as a lethal weapon." - - - - - Or if I couldn't get them to sell the Steelers to me, I would buy the Reds, fire Walt Jocketty, and then try to sell the Reds the next day. ____________________________________________________________
01-14-2016, 09:11 PM
The NFL wouldn't get a plug nickel from me and doesn't now. I don't wear free advertising for anyone. If they want to pay me to advertise for them that's an entirely different conversation, but advertising is a business. Tell you what..start a business if you don't already have one and ask Mike Brown if he'll wear clothing with your logo on it to every game for free. Want to guess what the answer will be?
In the immortal words of my old man, "Wait'll you get to be my age!"
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse, but the one comfort we have is Cincinnati sounds worse. ~Oliver Wendal Holmes Sr.
01-14-2016, 09:18 PM
(01-14-2016, 07:59 PM)Devils Advocate Wrote: Did you purchase 132 lottery tickets? This is completely wrong. It does increase the chances of winning, although still practically zero. 2 tickets are essentially twice as likely to win and 100 tickets are 100 times as likely, and so on. The smartest number to buy based probability is and always will be zero, but your odds do increase proportional to the number of tickets purchased.
01-14-2016, 11:17 PM
(01-14-2016, 09:18 PM)Psycholomonkey Wrote: This is completely wrong. It does increase the chances of winning, although still practically zero. 2 tickets are essentially twice as likely to win and 100 tickets are 100 times as likely, and so on. The smartest number to buy based probability is and always will be zero, but your odds do increase proportional to the number of tickets purchased. From the players perspective, I suppose. From the lotto's perspective, no. So I guess It's a matter of perspective.
-That which we need most, will be found where we want to visit least.-
01-14-2016, 11:22 PM
(01-14-2016, 11:17 PM)Devils Advocate Wrote: From the players perspective, I suppose. No, am pretty sure it's from the perspective of simple math/probability. I hold my hands behind my back, holding up a certain number of fingers. Who will be more likely to guess the number right? The guy who only gets one guess or the guy who gets to guess three times? ____________________________________________________________
01-15-2016, 12:05 AM
Sounds like someone just wasted 264 dollars.
01-15-2016, 12:07 AM
(01-14-2016, 11:22 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: No, am pretty sure it's from the perspective of simple math/probability. Hold up 600 million fingers.
-That which we need most, will be found where we want to visit least.-
01-15-2016, 01:03 AM
(01-15-2016, 12:07 AM)Devils Advocate Wrote: Hold up 600 million fingers. Hold up 600 million fingers and the guy who gets to guess once has a 1/600,000,000 chance of guessing right. The guy who gets to guess 132 times has a 1/4,545,454 chance of guessing right. Is it still ridiuculous odds? Yes. Are they significantly better odds? Obviously. Once again, that's how math and probability work. I'm not sure why you're so set on this blatantly wrong idea that 132 chances gives you the same odds at 1 chance. ____________________________________________________________
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|