Posts: 14,152
Threads: 501
Reputation:
106706
Joined: May 2015
I know, I know...the Bengals don't sign free agents (not true). I also know that no one wants to play here and Brown and Marvin need to go (not happening, blah, blah, blah....)
Here is what I would like to see the Bengals do this offseason before the draft:
-Release Adam Jones
-Trade AJ McCarron (nothing less than a high second)
-Retain: Whitworth, Kirkpatrick, Sexy, Zeitler
-Sign Prince Amukamora
- Sign Jabaal Sheard
Priorities in the draft (not in any particular order of importance):
RB
C
G
LB
CB
OT
TE
DE
That is a pretty broad brush, and we have mocked the way to address those positions to death...and there are a lot of really good options out there. I think signing veterans that would contribute right away (Prince and Sheard) would not only solidify an already solid defense, but allow the draft to re-build the offensive line and get a couple more key weapons. When you figure the compensatory picks and the fact that they are able to be traded this year, the Bengal should be able to draft individuals who are either immediate starters or can at the very least compete for a starting position with their first four selections.
I would hope those positions would be RB, C, DE, and LB. Thoughts?
Posts: 18,696
Threads: 463
Reputation:
119360
Joined: May 2015
Location: Nashville, TN
(02-07-2017, 10:51 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: I know, I know...the Bengals don't sign free agents (not true). I also know that no one wants to play here and Brown and Marvin need to go (not happening, blah, blah, blah....)
Here is what I would like to see the Bengals do this offseason before the draft:
-Release Adam Jones
-Trade AJ McCarron (nothing less than a high second)
-Retain: Whitworth, Kirkpatrick, Sexy, Zeitler
-Sign Prince Amukamora
- Sign Jabaal Sheard
Priorities in the draft (not in any particular order of importance):
RB
C
G
LB
CB
OT
TE
DE
That is a pretty broad brush, and we have mocked the way to address those positions to death...and there are a lot of really good options out there. I think signing veterans that would contribute right away (Prince and Sheard) would not only solidify an already solid defense, but allow the draft to re-build the offensive line and get a couple more key weapons. When you figure the compensatory picks and the fact that they are able to be traded this year, the Bengal should be able to draft individuals who are either immediate starters or can at the very least compete for a starting position with their first four selections.
I would hope those positions would be RB, C, DE, and LB. Thoughts?
Didn't you forget WR somewhere in there? It's very difficult to make an argument that the Bengals can afford to move on from LaFell, not get another WR in FA, and not address WR with an early round draft pick.
Zac Taylor 2019-2020: 6 total wins
Zac Taylor 2021-2022: Double-digit wins each season, plus 5 postseason wins
Zac Taylor 2023: 9 wins despite losing Burrow half the season
Zac Taylor 2024: Started 1-4. If he can turn this into a playoff appearance, it will be impressive.
Sorry for Party Rocking!
Posts: 14,152
Threads: 501
Reputation:
106706
Joined: May 2015
(02-07-2017, 01:20 PM)ochocincos Wrote: Didn't you forget WR somewhere in there? It's very difficult to make an argument that the Bengals can afford to move on from LaFell, not get another WR in FA, and not address WR with an early round draft pick.
I don't think so....The WRs right now are Green, Boyd, and Core as the starting 3-wide set, with Erickson as the backup at slot, and Wright able to play pretty much any of the positions (though I am not the biggest fan of his, I know the Bengals like him). And let's not forget that this team has a couple very capable TEs in Eifert and Uzomah that will become even more important.
Sure, if a talent is there, he could get drafted (I really like Golladay) but I see many more important front line needs.
Posts: 18,696
Threads: 463
Reputation:
119360
Joined: May 2015
Location: Nashville, TN
(02-07-2017, 05:02 PM)SHRacerX Wrote: I don't think so....The WRs right now are Green, Boyd, and Core as the starting 3-wide set, with Erickson as the backup at slot, and Wright able to play pretty much any of the positions (though I am not the biggest fan of his, I know the Bengals like him). And let's not forget that this team has a couple very capable TEs in Eifert and Uzomah that will become even more important.
Sure, if a talent is there, he could get drafted (I really like Golladay) but I see many more important front line needs.
Zac Taylor 2019-2020: 6 total wins
Zac Taylor 2021-2022: Double-digit wins each season, plus 5 postseason wins
Zac Taylor 2023: 9 wins despite losing Burrow half the season
Zac Taylor 2024: Started 1-4. If he can turn this into a playoff appearance, it will be impressive.
Sorry for Party Rocking!
Posts: 17,163
Threads: 237
Reputation:
134614
Joined: Oct 2015
(02-07-2017, 05:02 PM)SHRacerX Wrote: I don't think so....The WRs right now are Green, Boyd, and Core as the starting 3-wide set, with Erickson as the backup at slot, and Wright able to play pretty much any of the positions (though I am not the biggest fan of his, I know the Bengals like him). And let's not forget that this team has a couple very capable TEs in Eifert and Uzomah that will become even more important.
Sure, if a talent is there, he could get drafted (I really like Golladay) but I see many more important front line needs.
So basically you just want to run with an ever thinner version of the already thin WR group from 2016. Sounds like a recipe for disaster.
The only thing the TEs are capable at are being hurt (Eifert) and dropping passes (Uzomah).
Your scenario is relying on every single person being both healthy and better. That's a recipe for disaster before the season even starts.
____________________________________________________________
The 2021 season Super Bowl was over 1,000 days ago.
Posts: 14,152
Threads: 501
Reputation:
106706
Joined: May 2015
(02-08-2017, 12:29 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: So basically you just want to run with an ever thinner version of the already thin WR group from 2016. Sounds like a recipe for disaster.
The only thing the TEs are capable at are being hurt (Eifert) and dropping passes (Uzomah).
Your scenario is relying on every single person being both healthy and better. That's a recipe for disaster before the season even starts.
Jake Kumerow and Alonzo Russell will fight it out for the #6 WR spot. Your comments about the TEs are based out of frustration. Uzomah made huge strides in his first action and was headed to a solid season before injury slowed him, and Eifert's impact could be felt immediately upon his return. He had 5 TDs in just 8 games.
My scenario has to do with the fact that they aren't releasing AJ, Boyd, Core, Erickson, or Wright as they all have important roles. The #6 WR will likely not be active at games anyways. They are also not releasing Eifert, Kroft, Uzomah, or Hewitt. So, you might want a vertical threat to stretch the field, but I think that player is already on the team in Core, and has already earned the spot. The coaches love him. He's 6'3" tall, 220 lbs, and runs a 4.4 forty yard dash. It would take a hell of a draft pick to supplant him. There are much bigger needs on this roster, and I addressed those in my OP.
Posts: 19,659
Threads: 633
Reputation:
85339
Joined: Oct 2016
I'd retain Lafell. He's not that expensive overall.
I'd love to see us add Fairley at DT and pair him with Atkins with Billings/Sims as the backups.
It seems like EVERY year we have a WR that we're counting on injured. I'd work Core into the mix more steadily...but not ready to make him the #2 guy.
Other than that...I think you have a solid plan.
Posts: 11,960
Threads: 103
Reputation:
81482
Joined: May 2015
(02-08-2017, 12:29 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: So basically you just want to run with an ever thinner version of the already thin WR group from 2016. Sounds like a recipe for disaster.
The only thing the TEs are capable at are being hurt (Eifert) and dropping passes (Uzomah).
Your scenario is relying on every single person being both healthy and better. That's a recipe for disaster before the season even starts.
Uzomah dropped one pass. Stop with that myth.
Posts: 3,124
Threads: 75
Reputation:
19563
Joined: Feb 2017
With 11 picks I don't know about freeing up the draft but Zach Brown, Sheard or someone like Fairly or Chris Baker (rumored to not be back with Washington). I'm not sure how soon Vigil might be ready for a bigger role and baker may be a little expensive. And I would still draft an end early. Our front seven needs an infusion of speed.
Posts: 36,296
Threads: 49
Reputation:
234784
Joined: May 2015
Location: Star Valley, Wyoming
(02-07-2017, 10:51 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: I know, I know...the Bengals don't sign free agents (not true). I also know that no one wants to play here and Brown and Marvin need to go (not happening, blah, blah, blah....)
Here is what I would like to see the Bengals do this offseason before the draft:
-Release Adam Jones
-Trade AJ McCarron (nothing less than a high second)
-Retain: Whitworth, Kirkpatrick, Sexy, Zeitler
-Sign Prince Amukamora
- Sign Jabaal Sheard
Priorities in the draft (not in any particular order of importance):
RB
C
G
LB
CB
OT
TE
DE
That is a pretty broad brush, and we have mocked the way to address those positions to death...and there are a lot of really good options out there. I think signing veterans that would contribute right away (Prince and Sheard) would not only solidify an already solid defense, but allow the draft to re-build the offensive line and get a couple more key weapons. When you figure the compensatory picks and the fact that they are able to be traded this year, the Bengal should be able to draft individuals who are either immediate starters or can at the very least compete for a starting position with their first four selections.
I would hope those positions would be RB, C, DE, and LB. Thoughts?
Like it a lot.
Devin Taylor DE from the Lions is another guy i would like in FA and Ricky Wagner OT.
But getting Sheard and Prince would be good moves for us just the same.
Taylor just seems more of a fit to me than Sheard who is more of a 3-4 End.
Posts: 14,152
Threads: 501
Reputation:
106706
Joined: May 2015
(02-12-2017, 03:50 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Like it a lot.
Devin Taylor DE from the Lions is another guy i would like in FA and Ricky Wagner OT.
But getting Sheard and Prince would be good moves for us just the same.
Taylor just seems more of a fit to me than Sheard who is more of a 3-4 End.
I was watching how Atlanta used some 3-4 ends as DEs in their 4-3 and it worked pretty well. No one got outside of them. If we had better speed at LB (I think Vigil being on the field now as the other nickel backer with Burfict will help tremendously), then a more stout front four could keep them clean to make plays.
|