Betsy Devos Could Face Jail After Judge Rules She Violated 2018 Order On Student Loan

[GMDino]

https://www.newsweek.com/betsy-devos-could-face-jail-after-judge-rules-violated-2018-order-1463764?fbclid=IwAR3DRQnRmF-TGnlzkvxbOIsDk8xyfLShRka-54uNJhKpPtzbJ-cxHAjs8zo

Quote:Education Secretary Betsy DeVos has been threatened with the possibility of jail after a judge deemed she was violating a court order for continuing to collect student debts on a now-defunct school.


That ruling, handed down in June of 2018, was made by U.S. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim and prevented DeVos and her Department of Education for going after former students at the bankrupt Corinthian Colleges Inc.


However, Kim said she was "astounded" to discover that DeVos was violating the court order at a hearing in San Francisco on Monday after a filing by the Education Department earlier disclosed that more than 16,000 former students at Corinthian College "were incorrectly informed at one time or another ... that they had payments due on their federal student loans."

At least 1,800 people reportedly lost wages or tax refunds according to the filing.


"At best it is gross negligence, at worst it's an intentional flouting of my order," Kim said, reported Bloomberg.

"I'm not sure if this is contempt or sanctions," she added. "I'm not sending anyone to jail yet but it's good to know I have that ability."


The case traces its way back to 2015 when Corinthian had been among the largest for-profit college chains in the United States until a wave of investigations and litigation—including a complaint by the 2020 presidential hopeful and then California Attorney General Kamala Harris—alleged widespread deception and fraud.


The company then filed for bankruptcy protection the same year and the federal government later ruled that as many as 335,000 former students could be entitled to have their debts cancelled under The Borrower Defense to Repayment program—an initiative started in 2016 to provide loan relief for students who had been defrauded by predatory schools.


However once DeVos took over the Department of Education in 2017, numerous attempts were made to limit the scope of the program, in addition to effectively ignoring roughly 160,000 applications made for loan forgiveness, according to a New York Times report.


In 2017, a class action suit by approximately 80,000 Corinthian students sued the Education Department, alleging that the body had ceased to forgive the loans.


Instead of showing their compliance with the loan relief program, Education Department filings revealed that they instead were still pursuing students for loan repayment and had only pardoned 10 student loans.


"There have to be consequences for violation of my order sixteen thousand times," Kim said, according to a release.


Additionally, Kim ordered for the lawsuit against DeVos to go "full-steam ahead" and ordered lawyers for both camps to file the relevant filings to assist her in ruling whether DeVos is, in fact, in contempt of court.

Eileen Connor, legal director at the Project on Predatory Student Lending, the not-for-profit Harvard University project which represents the 80,000 students, told Bloomberg: "We think contempt is clear on the record presently before the court, and expect that the court will issue that finding, regardless of what sanctions are imposed."

[Benton]

I wouldn't be surprised if a few people in the trump administration face charges when his time is over.

And mostly likely, they'll be pardoned by whoever comes next as part of a deal to pass "x" legislation. It works for both sides. The next administration gets something they want and to show they're nonpartisan. And the people who broke the rules get away with breaking rules.

[*Nately120*]

I'm starting to lose faith that a person can become ultra rich without doing illegal stuff.

[Yojimbo]

(10-08-2019, 03:40 PM)Nately120 Wrote: I'm starting to lose faith that a person can become ultra rich without doing illegal stuff.

I read a poll a couple of years ago, that asked CEO about ethics and something like 75% said having ethics diminished profits.

[fredtoast]

(10-08-2019, 04:27 PM)Yojimbo Wrote: I read a poll a couple of years ago, that asked CEO about ethics and something like 75% said having ethics diminished profits.

And the other 25% are liars.

I don't think anyone, either unethical or ethical, would deny that you can make more profits if you are unethical, but that does not mean all these people are unethical.


This is why we have to have a strong government.  Capitalism produces the most efficiency and progress, but it also rewards unethical behavior.  So we have to have a government strong enough to protect the citizens from exploitation by the powerful wealthy elite.