09-09-2023, 12:33 PM
https://www.foxnews.com/us/california-scientist-left-out-full-truth-climate-change-wildfire-study-published
California scientist says he ‘left out the full truth’ to get climate change wildfire study published
Patrick Brown said he "narrowly focused" his study because of the pressure scientists face to be published in prestigious articles
This article expresses a scientist left out anything contradicting climate change. His reason is his study would not be published thus costing him money. I always say follow the money. I hope we all want to believe every scientific study we come across, but in this case this scientist left out key information.
Is the more of the norm than we realize? In the case of wildfires, my belief are either man made through arson or poor attention paid to the brush. We saw democrats come out immediately after the Maui disaster blaming climate change. Now we know they were 100% wrong. 1st they were wrong to rush to an unverified cause of the fire and also to not support the people of Maui versus a climate agenda .
2nd, they were wrong because climate change had no impact on the Maui fire. It started due to negligence of a power company maintaining the areas beneath their power lines. It spread due to the grasses were known to be highly flammable, it continued to spread because the electric was not immediately cut off and some generous did not release water to put the fire out.
I know everyone wants to believe every scientist does a comprehensive study, but sadly money can dictate the results. If scientist concluded climate change was not as impactful as we are led to believe, the money to fund these studies would stop. So, it is a scientist's best interest to come to certain conclusions so the money continues to flow.
California scientist says he ‘left out the full truth’ to get climate change wildfire study published
Patrick Brown said he "narrowly focused" his study because of the pressure scientists face to be published in prestigious articles
This article expresses a scientist left out anything contradicting climate change. His reason is his study would not be published thus costing him money. I always say follow the money. I hope we all want to believe every scientific study we come across, but in this case this scientist left out key information.
Is the more of the norm than we realize? In the case of wildfires, my belief are either man made through arson or poor attention paid to the brush. We saw democrats come out immediately after the Maui disaster blaming climate change. Now we know they were 100% wrong. 1st they were wrong to rush to an unverified cause of the fire and also to not support the people of Maui versus a climate agenda .
2nd, they were wrong because climate change had no impact on the Maui fire. It started due to negligence of a power company maintaining the areas beneath their power lines. It spread due to the grasses were known to be highly flammable, it continued to spread because the electric was not immediately cut off and some generous did not release water to put the fire out.
I know everyone wants to believe every scientist does a comprehensive study, but sadly money can dictate the results. If scientist concluded climate change was not as impactful as we are led to believe, the money to fund these studies would stop. So, it is a scientist's best interest to come to certain conclusions so the money continues to flow.
Free Agency ain't over until it is over.
First 6 years BB - 41 wins and 54 losses with 1-1 playoff record with 2 teams Browns and Pats
First 6 years BB - 41 wins and 54 losses with 1-1 playoff record with 2 teams Browns and Pats