Creationist Ken Ham Blames Atheists For Ark Park Failure

[Griever]

(06-19-2017, 01:51 PM)michaelsean Wrote: What did the animals eat?

according to Ham, they all ate plants, even the dinosaurs

[*michaelsean*]

[*michaelsean*]

(06-21-2017, 12:04 PM)Griever Wrote: according to Ham, they all ate plants, even the dinosaurs

And the  lions and tigers and all the other big cats and wolves?

[Matt_Crimson]

(06-21-2017, 12:10 PM)michaelsean Wrote: And the  lions and tigers and all the other big cats and wolves?

I don't think you'll get a definitive answer on this and any answer you do get will be assumed as far as what was actually eaten by the animals. But do keep in mind that God made it rain 40 days and nights. So what the animals ate to survive isn't really as grand of a question as one might think.

[oncemoreuntothejimbreech]

(06-22-2017, 09:11 AM)Matt_Crimson Wrote: I don't think you'll get a definitive answer on this and any answer you do get will be assumed as far as what was actually eaten by the animals. But do keep in mind that God made it rain 40 days and nights. So what the animals ate to survive isn't really as grand of a question as one might think.

God miracled their hunger away.

[Vas Deferens]

(06-23-2017, 12:06 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: God miracled their hunger away.

Along with the feces of a few thousand animals.

[Matt_Crimson]

(06-23-2017, 12:06 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: God miracled their hunger away.

Perhaps.

Quote:Along with the feces of a few thousand animals

Well I mean if you created the universe I think you'd be able to get rid of feces.

[Vas Deferens]

(06-23-2017, 10:09 PM)Matt_Crimson Wrote: Perhaps.



Well I mean if you created the universe I think you'd be able to get rid of feces.

Well I mean if you created the universe you'd think he'd make a few more people to cut down on all the mother/daughter/sister faucking. Or was he just tired again?

[xxlt]

(06-19-2017, 12:17 AM)Vas Deferens Wrote: Can't wait til this guy gets caught in a state parks cabin with a sheep and and used condoms.  


Seriously though, I've thought about visiting just for the kicks of asking questions on the tour.  Don't blame us.  Sounds like a great time to give vision to the blind in person.   I'm a miracle worker like that.

Careful there!

[xxlt]

(06-19-2017, 10:15 AM)Au165 Wrote: That is really the issue. Did he think people would make multiple pilgrimages to it each year? It's a spectacle that once you see it once your good I'd imagine. It was simply a horrible business plan from the start.

Heathen!

[xxlt]

(06-19-2017, 10:23 AM)samhain Wrote: Terrible idea to begin with.  It's kind of a haul to get there from any real population center.  It's not far enough to stop someone who really wants to see it, but it's too far for someone who may do it on a whim or spontaneously on a random afternoon.  

I've disliked the idea from the start, but even an objective assessment of the concept would have been cautious at best.  Others have tried Ark parks and they have failed miserably.  This one may be bigger and better funded, but at the end of the day it's still what it is, i.e. a glorified petting zoo with a zipline and some indoctrination tossed in for good measure.  There are cooler animals at any number of zoos in the region.  There are better rides at Kings Island.  

I still say wait for it to tank and re-aprropriate it as Kentucky's first recreational pot dispensary-casino-distillery-***** house.  Hell, have a gun range out back, too.  Guarantee people would drive long distances to support the local economy if Williamstown had that kind of setup.

You, sir, are a visionary. The gun range is the frosting on that beautiful layer cake.

[Matt_Crimson]

(06-24-2017, 09:16 AM)Vas Deferens Wrote: Well I mean if you created the universe you'd think he'd make a few more people to cut down on all the mother/daughter/sister faucking.  Or was he just tired again?

Why would I think that?

[Vas Deferens]

(06-24-2017, 10:25 AM)Matt_Crimson Wrote: Why would I think that?

You're right. Why think anything at all.

How old was Noah when he built this thing?

[Matt_Crimson]

(06-25-2017, 01:15 PM)Vas Deferens Wrote: You're right.  Why think anything at all.  

I'm not suggesting one shouldn't think. I'm asking you to enlighten me on why I'd think what you think I should thjnk.

[Vas Deferens]

(06-25-2017, 02:48 PM)Matt_Crimson Wrote: I'm not suggesting one shouldn't think. I'm asking you to enlighten me on why I'd think what you think I should thjnk.

Oh I see. Let me rephrase. A person looking intelligently at the premise, would think an all mighty deity that created the universe would place more than a single set of humans within said universe as to avoid incestuous procreation.

[Matt_Crimson]

(06-25-2017, 03:07 PM)Vas Deferens Wrote: Oh I see.  Let me rephrase.  A person looking intelligently at the premise, would think an all mighty deity that created the universe would place more than a single set of humans within said universe as to avoid incestuous procreation.

I see it didn't take long for the passive aggressive insults to ensue. 

I'll ask again, but more clearly. Why would someone think that God would avoid incestuous procreation?

[*wildcats forever*]

(06-25-2017, 03:07 PM)Vas Deferens Wrote: Oh I see.  Let me rephrase.  A person looking intelligently at the premise, would think an all mighty deity that created the universe would place more than a single set of humans within said universe as to avoid incestuous procreation.

(06-25-2017, 03:29 PM)Matt_Crimson Wrote: I see it didn't take long for the passive aggressive insults to ensue. 

I'll ask again, but more clearly. Why would someone think that God would avoid incestuous procreation?

We're all family here, so let's play nice ....

[Vas Deferens]

(06-25-2017, 03:29 PM)Matt_Crimson Wrote: I see it didn't take long for the passive aggressive insults to ensue. 

I'll ask again, but more clearly. Why would someone think that God would avoid incestuous procreation?

Not sure what was passive aggressive about that comment. I understand you may not have liked the answer, but it was an honest reply to your query.

Regarding your clearly stated inquiry above. Someone would think god would avoid incestuous procreation because it is sub-optimal, leads to genetic abnormalities and in many cases is forced on younger unwilling participants. Would you not agree?

[Vas Deferens]

(06-25-2017, 04:19 PM)wildcats forever Wrote: We're all family here, so let's play nice ....

No offense intended.

[HarleyDog]

I liked the idea and am interested in seeing it. Once!