FBI report: Hillarys emails...worse than we thought

[Vlad]

 Will Hillary be treated the same as General Petraeus? Or does she need an R after her name?

Hillary Clinton's emails on her unsecured, homebrew server contained intelligence from the U.S. government's most secretive (SAPs) and highly classified programs, according to an unclassified letter from a top inspector general to senior lawmakers."

..."several dozen" additional classified emails -- including specific intelligence known as "special access programs" (SAP).  

That indicates a level of classification beyond even “top secret,”

 http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/01/19/inspector-general-clinton-emails-had-intel-from-most-secretive-classified-programs.html

Love how the mainstream media, guardians of the Democrat party, has picked up and ran with this news.

[BmorePat87]

Is Petraeus a Republican? I was under the impression he didn't subscribe to a party.

[StLucieBengal]

She shouldn't be able to run with all her shenanigans . Her foundation alone should keep her out of any public office.

[*bfine32*]

I sincerely hope nobody else enters the Democratic/Socialist race.

[Vlad]

Hillary more so than any other candidate is in this for herself and to promote her legacy.

[*Nately120*]

Oh man, if this election comes down to Trump vs. Sanders people might finally realize I've been a genius for voting for a 3rd party all these years.

[oncemoreuntothejimbreech]

(01-20-2016, 03:17 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I sincerely hope nobody else enters the Democratic/Socialist race.

Why not?  Don't you want the best candidate possible regardless of party affiliation?  Given the current choices it's like asking me which STD do I want; gonorrhea or chlamydia?  I don't want either.

[StLucieBengal]

Would love to see a sanders vs Cruz general. Would be a chance for the country to get two clear opposite directions for the country.

[Belsnickel]

(01-20-2016, 04:57 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Why not?  Don't you want the best candidate possible regardless of party affiliation?  Given the current choices it's like asking me which STD do I want; gonorrhea or chlamydia?  I don't want either.

Pretty much. The DNC has shot themselves in the foot. They shooed people away by championing Hillary from the start, and continued to do so after so many issues have come to light. I mock the GOP field because, well, they deserve it, but at least there are choices over there. While Sanders is making a stand, he has no chance.

[BmorePat87]

I don't understand why 95% of Democrats think a 69 or 74 year is the best bet against a young Latino from Florida.

You got a 53 year old former governor with a track record that matches your platform.

[Belsnickel]

(01-20-2016, 05:05 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I don't understand why 95% of Democrats think a 69 or 74 year is the best bet against a young Latino from Florida.

You got a 53 year old former governor with a track record that matches your platform.

Yeah, I don't get it either. He's also the only one with experience in the Executive seat.

[RoyleRedlegs]

(01-20-2016, 05:05 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I don't understand why 95% of Democrats think a 69 or 74 year is the best bet against a young Latino from Florida.

You got a 53 year old former governor with a track record that matches your platform.

George P Bush? 

[*bfine32*]

(01-20-2016, 04:57 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Why not?  Don't you want the best candidate possible regardless of party affiliation?  Given the current choices it's like asking me which STD do I want; gonorrhea or chlamydia?  I don't want either.

Well if there is a conservative Democrat then we can discuss it. I was willing to listen to Webb because of his Military background; but he shot himself in the foot "pun intended" when he mentioned killing someone in combat. Not the best way to garner a lot of liberal support.

[Aquapod770]

(01-20-2016, 05:05 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I don't understand why 95% of Democrats think a 69 or 74 year is the best bet against a young Latino from Florida.

You got a 53 year old former governor with a track record that matches your platform.

That everyone hates. 




For real, I know there are some people in MD who liked him, but come on...he was terrible. Semi-related note: Hogan has been crushing it as Governor so far. 

[Nebuchadnezzar]

Maybe Gary Johnson will gain some traction during the General and maybe win!!!

Oh who am I kidding, the guy has no chance, lol.

[RoyleRedlegs]

(01-20-2016, 07:20 PM)Nebuchadnezzar Wrote: Maybe Gary Johnson will gain some traction during the General and maybe win!!!

Oh who am I kidding, the guy has no chance, lol.

He's still getting my vote. 

[*Nately120*]

(01-20-2016, 07:20 PM)Nebuchadnezzar Wrote: Maybe Gary Johnson will gain some traction during the General and maybe win!!!

Oh who am I kidding, the guy has no chance, lol.

Slightly related note:  People on both sides of the political spectrum tell me two things when I say I'm voting for or that I voted for Gary Johnson:

1.  Them - You are wasting your vote, he won't win.
Me - Ok, I won't vote then.
2.  Them - But you have to vote...what if everyone was like you and didn't vote?
Me - Wait...everyone is going to act exactly like me if I DON'T vote, but not if I DO vote?  No fair.

[BmorePat87]

(01-20-2016, 07:14 PM)Aquapod770 Wrote: That everyone hates. 




For real, I know there are some people in MD who liked him, but come on...he was terrible. Semi-related note: Hogan has been crushing it as Governor so far. 

He's been saying the right things for those who voted for him.

Personally I think it's stupid to put transportation money into highways in Harford to Delaware rather than lines in and out of Baltimore when Amazon needs more buses to drop their employees off and want to hire more people. 


That and Baltimore needs money for schools, not for prisons. 

[fredtoast]

Same old story from months ago.  This info was not classified when Clinton received it.

Plus it is hard to give much credibility to a story that calls a server "homebrew".

[Mike M (the other one)]

(01-20-2016, 08:12 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Same old story from months ago.  This info was not classified when Clinton received it.

Plus it is hard to give much credibility to a story that calls a server "homebrew".

EDIT: after reading the OP, I realized that he was talking about the Top Secret stuff again.

I read over the weekend that now they are talking about the money received from overseas to the Clinton Foundation and how she might have abused her power to do favors for people that donated those large sums.