Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise
Driskel may see time with 1's - Printable Version

+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Cincinnati-Bengals-NFL)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-JUNGLE-NOISE)
+--- Thread: Driskel may see time with 1's (/Thread-Driskel-may-see-time-with-1-s)

Pages: 1 2 3


RE: Driskel may see time with 1's - sandwedge - 08-16-2018

(08-16-2018, 03:15 PM)Nately120 Wrote: Barkley is crapola granola, Driskel is at least interesting, Woodside reminds me of a Pinto station wagon, Bridgewater ain't coming here unless we send a draft pick to NYC, AJ McCarron might be available eventually.


I want Driskel to start.  When he throws a pick I'll convince myself people aren't saying BOOOOOOOO, they're saying Drisk-OOOOOOOOOOOOL!



Who would you rather have as your QB...Jeff Driskel or Steve Urkel?

I had to think a bit on your Pinto station wagon.....  Tongue


RE: Driskel may see time with 1's - The Caped Crusader - 08-16-2018

I'll take Uncle Rico over Urkel, actually.


RE: Driskel may see time with 1's - Wyche'sWarrior - 08-16-2018

(08-16-2018, 03:39 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: How cool would that be?  Every time he completed a pass, they could blast his trademark "tee hee hee, snort" over the public address.   LOL


"Did I do thaaaaaat???" Smirk


RE: Driskel may see time with 1's - The Caped Crusader - 08-16-2018

(08-16-2018, 04:44 PM)Wyche Wrote: "Did I do thaaaaaat???" Smirk

That would be for when he threw an interception lol


RE: Driskel may see time with 1's - Nicomo Cosca - 08-17-2018

(08-16-2018, 04:33 PM)The Caped Crusader Wrote: I'll take Uncle Rico over Urkel, actually.

Who wouldn’t? He can throw a football over a mountain! Would have won state if coach had put him in.


RE: Driskel may see time with 1's - Tiger Teeth - 08-17-2018

I hope Dalton doesn't get injured because whichever one they put in is going to shit the bed.


RE: Driskel may see time with 1's - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-17-2018

(08-16-2018, 08:22 AM)Big Boss Wrote: Driskel and Barkley both suck, but Driskel at least has some spunk.  He's more entertaining to watch, for whatever that's worth.

Why do you say Driskel sucks?


RE: Driskel may see time with 1's - XenoMorph - 08-17-2018

(08-17-2018, 06:13 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Why do you say Driskel sucks?

well hes no matt scott    Dude literally left his guts on the field

or Dan Lefevor... for that matter


RE: Driskel may see time with 1's - BURROWorBUST - 08-17-2018

(08-16-2018, 11:05 AM)Go Cards Wrote: Driskell looked better than AJM last year but hardly nobody would admit it.

But think giving him the stage is to see if they really need to bring in another back up or not.

Believe they realize Barkley is not the guy.

Agreed. I think we're seeing the Bengals being honest with themselves about what's in the best interest of building as good of a football team that they can. Within Mike's budget, of course.  LMAO


RE: Driskel may see time with 1's - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-17-2018

(08-17-2018, 06:16 PM)XenoMorph Wrote: well hes no matt scott    Dude literally left his guts on the field

or Dan Lefevor...  for that matter

Hilarious

Scott was clutch lol

I got the Fever man.

Great times. Cool


RE: Driskel may see time with 1's - bengalfan74 - 08-17-2018

(08-16-2018, 04:29 PM)sandwedge Wrote: I had to think a bit on your Pinto station wagon.....  Tongue

We has a like 1970 Olds woody, big giant extra long one.  Rock On


RE: Driskel may see time with 1's - Joelist - 08-17-2018

Driskel at least looks like with good coaching he could develop into something good. Barkley looks beyond help.


RE: Driskel may see time with 1's - Bilbo Saggins - 08-18-2018

McCarron did not look very good with the 1s against Cleveland, and there are reports that his throwing shoulder is injured. He has been thoroughly outclassed by Nate Peterman and Josh Allen based upon everything that I've read and seen. 


RE: Driskel may see time with 1's - Luvnit2 - 08-18-2018

How can anyone fairly evaluate Driskel yet? He has never played with a first team offense against a 1st team defense in preseason or regular season game?


I am excited he may get time throwing to AJ Green, Eifert maybe, Boyd, Ross and Malone. I will try not to get too excited if he plays well or call him garbage if he struggles in his debut on the big stage if he plays with the 1's.


RE: Driskel may see time with 1's - Daddy-O - 08-18-2018

(08-16-2018, 08:22 AM)Big Boss Wrote: Driskel and Barkley both suck, but Driskel at least has some spunk.  He's more entertaining to watch, for whatever that's worth.

Wow, pretty harsh!

Just because Driskel was not a household name doesn't mean he can't be successful.  To say he sucks is a little overboard considering every opportunity he's had has come with back-ups.  I've been to camp and watched him.  At least to this untrained eye he appears to be accurate and very mobile.  Put him with a the 1's and see what happens.

To be honest, I would much prefer to have him as a backup than Barkley.  The league has already seen what Barkley can do...meh.


RE: Driskel may see time with 1's - Bengalitis - 08-18-2018

I will support the QB with the hottest wife. Cool


RE: Driskel may see time with 1's - Nicomo Cosca - 08-18-2018

(08-18-2018, 10:21 AM)Bengalitis Wrote: I will support the QB with the hottest wife. Cool

Umm... that’s probably Barkley lol

[Image: hair1-e1439592741318.jpg?quality=65&strip=all]


RE: Driskel may see time with 1's - Tiger Teeth - 08-18-2018

(08-18-2018, 10:28 AM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: Umm... that’s probably Barkley lol

[Image: hair1-e1439592741318.jpg?quality=65&strip=all]

HIT!


RE: Driskel may see time with 1's - Wyche'sWarrior - 08-18-2018

(08-18-2018, 10:39 AM)Tiger Teeth Wrote: HIT!


Phshaw!


RE: Driskel may see time with 1's - wolfkaosaun - 08-18-2018

I would be fine with it. Offensive line needs a lot more time on the field, and gives Driskel a shot at being QB 2. He looked much better than Barkley, but the 'weaker competition' conversation starts up there, so this will help.

I even thought last year that Driskel looked better than McCarron. Granted, it was a small sample size.