+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Cincinnati-Bengals-NFL)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-JUNGLE-NOISE)
+--- Thread: Driskel should be backup QB (/Thread-Driskel-should-be-backup-QB)
Pages:
1
2
RE: Driskel should be backup QB - Millhouse - 08-20-2018
(08-20-2018, 11:59 AM)bengalfan74 Wrote: Agree,
I'd love to get Bridgewater if he becomes available but I highly doubt that's gonna happen. Driskel shows promise, that's about all you can ask for in a backup. It's very rare to have a Joe Montana waiting in the wings.
For me Driskell has shown a stronger arm with more mobility than Barkley. Barkley has a noodle arm it seems, but even worse is that he doesn't make up for that with accuracy.
Until I see Driskell against starters though, I don't have anything else to say about him. As of now though, he should be the #2 two instead of Barkley. And I dont see the Bengals at this point bringing in anyone else, so the job should be his.
RE: Driskel should be backup QB - psychdoctor - 08-20-2018
(08-20-2018, 01:22 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Driskel over Barkley
Matt Moore over Driskel.
I think that kid from the Bears, Bray or whatever his name, is better than all listed above.
RE: Driskel should be backup QB - Millhouse - 08-20-2018
(08-20-2018, 01:22 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Driskel over Barkley
Matt Moore over Driskel.
Throwing wise Id take Moore. But he has the mobility of Marvin.