![]() |
Alabama state official defends Roy Moore, citing Joseph and Mary - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums) +--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0) +---- Forum: P & R Archive (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-P-R-Archive) +---- Thread: Alabama state official defends Roy Moore, citing Joseph and Mary (/Thread-Alabama-state-official-defends-Roy-Moore-citing-Joseph-and-Mary) |
RE: Alabama state official defends Roy Moore, citing Joseph and Mary - GMDino - 11-14-2017 (11-14-2017, 02:15 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: They should be looked at and once he facts come out then we move forward with what is appropriate. Facts are out there. Women with nothing to gain told their stories. Moore denies them, kind of. When will it be appropriate? After the elections so he can be kicked out of office...for the third time? RE: Alabama state official defends Roy Moore, citing Joseph and Mary - GMDino - 11-14-2017 ![]() Edit: To be clear Moore admitted there was rape...he just disagreed with how the law was worded and therefore didn't want to "create a new law" just because there was a child involved. See? RE: Alabama state official defends Roy Moore, citing Joseph and Mary - StLucieBengal - 11-14-2017 (11-14-2017, 02:19 AM)GMDino Wrote: Facts are out there. Women with nothing to gain told their stories. Moore denies them, kind of. Nothing to gain but these same women have pro Hillary stuff all over their social media. They also have loads of anti trump stuff as welll. Which all got mysteriously removed once the allegations got out. This makes me question some of this stuff. Feels motivated by politics and not justice. RE: Alabama state official defends Roy Moore, citing Joseph and Mary - GMDino - 11-14-2017 (11-14-2017, 02:23 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Nothing to gain but these same women have pro Hillary stuff all over their social media. They also have loads of anti trump stuff as welll. Which all got mysteriously removed once the allegations got out. So you saw all of their social media before it got removed. Right. Just admit it's because he's a Republican. That would be much better for everyone involved. RE: Alabama state official defends Roy Moore, citing Joseph and Mary - hollodero - 11-14-2017 (11-14-2017, 02:23 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Nothing to gain but these same women have pro Hillary stuff all over their social media. They also have loads of anti trump stuff as welll. Which all got mysteriously removed once the allegations got out. So, you believe the women probably all lied because they are pro Hillary or anti Roy Moore. Everyday women, unpolitical or even claiming they voted for Trump (sure, another lie probably) likely just go public with made up stories to hurt Roy Moore for their liberal minds are so afraid of Roy Moore removing a swamp creature or for whatever reason. Partisanship really knows no boundaries. For you, that is. More reasonable people might have political opinions, but they don't put their life and reputation on the line for Hillary. That's... just astonishing you really publicly imply they invent that stories because they are liberals. How can you not be embarrassed. Also, how would you know about stuff that got mysteriously removed. Removed means it's gone and you can't see it, right? Did you follow these women before their allegations? RE: Alabama state official defends Roy Moore, citing Joseph and Mary - StLucieBengal - 11-14-2017 (11-14-2017, 02:27 AM)GMDino Wrote: So you saw all of their social media before it got removed. Right. Being a republican has nothing to do with it. He is anti establishment which is a direct threat to the uniparty. Too many red flags on this stuff to just go with it. Not like spacey or Weinstein. RE: Alabama state official defends Roy Moore, citing Joseph and Mary - StLucieBengal - 11-14-2017 (11-14-2017, 02:42 AM)hollodero Wrote: So, you believe the women probably all lied because they are pro Hillary or anti Roy Moore. Everyday women, unpolitical or even claiming they voted for Trump (sure, another lie probably) likely just go public with made up stories to hurt Roy Moore for their liberal minds are so afraid of Roy Moore removing a swamp creature or for whatever reason. I didn’t say they lied. I just said it deserves some vetting. Some things do not match up. RE: Alabama state official defends Roy Moore, citing Joseph and Mary - StLucieBengal - 11-14-2017 http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/10/roy-moores-accuser-did-work-for-joe-biden-other-democrats/ http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2017/11/10/alabama-accuser-deletes-anti-moore-postings-facebook-rants-removing-trump-office/ On Moore accuser political positions RE: Alabama state official defends Roy Moore, citing Joseph and Mary - hollodero - 11-14-2017 (11-14-2017, 02:44 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: I didn’t say they lied. I just said it deserves some vetting. Some things do not match up. You pretty much imply it. You said it feels politically motivated and mentioned the pro Hillary stuff on the women's social media pages. There's no doubt why you mentioned that or which direction your thoughts take here. So don't even start with this "I didn't say that" BS. If you want to backpedal, what I would recommend, do it properly - or flat out say what you imply. And it's Roy Moore who deserves the vetting now, even and especially from his own side. Instead you reference deleted ominous pro Hillary posts you couldn't have seen if what you said were true... yeah great way to not say stuff. RE: Alabama state official defends Roy Moore, citing Joseph and Mary - bfine32 - 11-14-2017 Kudos to the Republican establishment for condemning Moore's actions (alleged). This is the kind of decency before political affiliation that I would love to see from all elected officials; however, that is not always the case. RE: Alabama state official defends Roy Moore, citing Joseph and Mary - BmorePat87 - 11-14-2017 If Moore wins and is expelled, he will have been kicked out of two of three branches and levels of government. Now he just needs to become mayor and get kicked out of office to hit the cycle. RE: Alabama state official defends Roy Moore, citing Joseph and Mary - GMDino - 11-14-2017 (11-14-2017, 02:43 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Being a republican has nothing to do with it. He is anti establishment which is a direct threat to the uniparty. Too many red flags on this stuff to just go with it. Not like spacey or Weinstein. He's also an (alleged) pervert and (perhaps) pedophile. But hey..."uniparty". Is there a special box where you keep your morals and ethics while making these kind of decisions so you can use them later? RE: Alabama state official defends Roy Moore, citing Joseph and Mary - GMDino - 11-14-2017 (11-14-2017, 02:52 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/10/roy-moores-accuser-did-work-for-joe-biden-other-democrats/ I thought it wasn't about being Republican? This isn't about politics...it's about a 70 year old (who shouldn't be running for office anyway) who was already kicked out of office (twice) who has multiple accusations of sexual harassment (with minors) who hasn't denied that he dated minors (when he was in his 30's). Their politics be damned. It's about decency. Of which Moore supporters seem to have none. RE: Alabama state official defends Roy Moore, citing Joseph and Mary - GMDino - 11-14-2017 http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2017/11/gadsden_residents_say_moores_b.html Quote:Gadsden locals say Moore's predatory behavior at mall, restaurants not a secret But maybe they ALL worked on Biden's campaign....right? RE: Alabama state official defends Roy Moore, citing Joseph and Mary - Belsnickel - 11-14-2017 The Daily Caller on three of Moore's accusers being Republican: http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/13/three-roy-moore-accusers-are-republican-women/ RE: Alabama state official defends Roy Moore, citing Joseph and Mary - StLucieBengal - 11-14-2017 (11-14-2017, 03:07 AM)hollodero Wrote: You pretty much imply it. You said it feels politically motivated and mentioned the pro Hillary stuff on the women's social media pages. There's no doubt why you mentioned that or which direction your thoughts take here. So don't even start with this "I didn't say that" BS. If you want to backpedal, what I would recommend, do it properly - or flat out say what you imply. I didn’t imply anything. I said these allegations are a horrible situation. They need vetted. The first accuser was heavily involved in democrat politics and suddenly removed her social media posts about anti trump and pro Hillary right after she made the allegations and a story was ran. Why delete that stuff? I could see deleting personal things like photos and such. But why only remove the stuff that doesn’t matter. RE: Alabama state official defends Roy Moore, citing Joseph and Mary - Benton - 11-14-2017 (11-14-2017, 02:43 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Being a republican has nothing to do with it. He is anti establishment which is a direct threat to the uniparty. Too many red flags on this stuff to just go with it. Not like spacey or Weinstein. He's anti-establishment in the same way Trump is anti-establishment. IE, he isn't, he just isn't as predictable as industries would like. He's a sexual predator masquerading as a Christian Conservative. RE: Alabama state official defends Roy Moore, citing Joseph and Mary - BmorePat87 - 11-14-2017 ![]() RE: Alabama state official defends Roy Moore, citing Joseph and Mary - BmorePat87 - 11-14-2017 (11-14-2017, 09:47 AM)GMDino Wrote: http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2017/11/gadsden_residents_say_moores_b.html What a creep RE: Alabama state official defends Roy Moore, citing Joseph and Mary - hollodero - 11-14-2017 (11-14-2017, 10:19 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: I didn’t imply anything. No no no no no. You didn't say "horrible situation". You said, again, that it feels politically motivated and went straight to the accusers' political views. That's not saying horrible situation, that's also not a "I didn't imply anything", that's saying the accusers are not credible. Why even beat around the bush now instead of simply not bringing up that nonsense in the first place. (11-14-2017, 10:19 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: The first accuser was heavily involved in democrat politics and suddenly removed her social media posts about anti trump and pro Hillary right after she made the allegations and a story was ran. Why delete that stuff? I could see deleting personal things like photos and such. But why only remove the stuff that doesn’t matter. And here you go again, attacking the accuser's credibility because she might hold liberal views. First, deleting "that stuff" makes perfect sense, you see with your own eyes what Breitbart makes of those things. If a pro-Hillary meme of hers was to be found online, they would immediately imply all these women were political hacks and rally up the mob against them. Proof they would do that? They also do that right now. Whatever implies to the simpletons on the Breitbart board that this is all a liberal or establishment dirty trick gets a mention, and they willingly swallow it up as desired. You wouldn't want to be exposed to that kind of scrutiny. It's tough enough for them already without the public discussing their political stances. Second, here's the reaction basic decency demands: (11-14-2017, 08:59 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Kudos to the Republican establishment for condemning Moore's actions (alleged). This is the kind of decency before political affiliation that I would love to see from all elected officials Plain and simple. How can you not bring yourself to be on the side of basic decency, even if decency probably might be called an establishment thing. You still could join bfine and others close to your side, it's not too late. There's also nothing inherently wrong with being anti-establishment, but do you really need to get behing people who are highly suspicious of being child molesters in expressing that stance. And by all accouts, he is highly suspicious, even he himself couldn't give a clear cut defense when talking to the most friendly interviewer he could get. What he stutters on Hannity is astonishing and should be even enough for you. He "doesn't remember" if he dated underage girls? But he "usually asked permission of their mother"? I mean, come on. |