![]() |
NYT: Trump assaulted two women - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums) +--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0) +---- Forum: P & R Archive (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-P-R-Archive) +---- Thread: NYT: Trump assaulted two women (/Thread-NYT-Trump-assaulted-two-women) |
RE: NYT: Trump assaulted two women - Vas Deferens - 10-14-2016 (10-14-2016, 08:17 PM)PhilHos Wrote: How many of those have been proven true? I know those who defend Hillary because few of the scandals have been proven true are waiting till these are proven true before criticizing Trump. It kind of gives the claims of daddy putting his hand up womens skirts a little more credence when daddy says himself he's able to 'grab them by the *****'. Not sure what there is to defend anymore. The damage is done. The idea that someone would be able to avoid a past like his and become the POTUS validates my constant suspicion that he's a plant. RE: NYT: Trump assaulted two women - PhilHos - 10-14-2016 (10-14-2016, 08:25 PM)Vas Deferens Wrote: It kind of gives the claims of daddy putting his hand up womens skirts a little more credence when daddy says himself he's able to 'grab them by the *****'.Well, people are overlooking Hillary's crimes and her own sordid past and still vote for her. Is there any surprise that some will do the same for Trump? With that said, some on here (don't recall if you're one of them) have said we can't really hold Hillary's controversies against her because most haven't really been proven. I just want them to start, er, remain consistent. Sent from my SPH-L710T using Tapatalk RE: NYT: Trump assaulted two women - Vas Deferens - 10-14-2016 (10-14-2016, 08:31 PM)PhilHos Wrote: Well, people are overlooking Hillary's crimes and her own sordid past and still vote for her. Is there any surprise that some will do the same for Trump? I am not one of them. She's a real POS that rigged the DNC because she feels entitled to the position. That being said, still trust her with our country more than the idiot. RE: NYT: Trump assaulted two women - Belsnickel - 10-14-2016 (10-14-2016, 06:25 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Is it your assertion because they are weak? ![]() RE: NYT: Trump assaulted two women - bfine32 - 10-14-2016 (10-14-2016, 09:07 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: So why didn't any of these folks come forward in the same decade they were assaulted? What you view with a smiley; I view as a wake up. If nothing else comes out of the mess I hope the notion to come forward strongly when you feel you are assaulted is stressed. Applauding women that come forward a decade later does absolutely nothing. Nobody here condones sexual assault, but those that experience this must understand that you must come forward immediately. You not only help yourself but possibly others. RE: NYT: Trump assaulted two women - hollodero - 10-14-2016 (10-14-2016, 09:31 PM)bfine32 Wrote: So why didn't any of these folks come forward in the same decade they were assaulted?^ Well, what do you think. Why didn't they just come out against a powerful man with connections to the very top who probably would sue the women for defamation. Really, why didn't they. Just because they wouldn't stand a chance, would be shamed and possibly ruined? At some point, I don't get this any more. First you said normal talk amongst guys (which it really isn't), then you say only Billy Bush is the creep here (he is one, but this is a two-person dance really), then you claim a phrase like "I don't even wait" means in no way something unconsensual, then you say there is no proof he actually molested women. Now up to 6 women state he actually did as he himself said - which in my eyes is proof - and now you say it's all their fault and it's too late now. No matter what, you defend grabby Donald through all this darkness and amorality. Guess my question at this point is: Why? (If you choose to answer, please don't talk about Hillary. My question has nothing to do with her, nor should it.) RE: NYT: Trump assaulted two women - NATI BENGALS - 10-14-2016 (10-14-2016, 10:00 PM)hollodero Wrote: Well, what do you think. Why didn't they just come out against a powerful man with connections to the very top who probably would sue the women for defamation. Dont mean to answer for him. But it should be super obvious. He isnt a Trump supporter. He just has strong religious beliefs. RE: NYT: Trump assaulted two women - bfine32 - 10-15-2016 (10-14-2016, 10:00 PM)hollodero Wrote: Well, what do you think. Why didn't they just come out against a powerful man with connections to the very top who probably would sue the women for defamation. Well unfortunately for you, but fortunately for everybody else you do not get to decide who is guilty or not. If there were "proof" that he committed sexual assault he very well would be charged with a crime. I suppose the "why" is because I believe in due process and the presumption of innocence. I would most likely defend anyone against a lynch mob. RE: NYT: Trump assaulted two women - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 10-15-2016 This election is the worst I've ever seen and neither nominee is deserving of the Presidency. I haven't yet decided who I'm going to vote for, but it won't be either of these two. Regardless of who wins, we're all ****** for at least the next four years. So if there is just one good thing, just ONE, to come of this election maybe it would some of you sit down and read about the victims of sexual assault so you understand why the MAJORITY of victims NEVER report the crime. Although asking for one good thing to come of this cluster **** is probably too much to ask. I purposely picked an article which doesn't have anything to do with Donald Trump so maybe you can try to read it with an open mind. http://www.pcar.org/blog/common-victim-behaviors-survivors-sexual-abuse Quote:You are here RE: NYT: Trump assaulted two women - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 10-15-2016 (10-15-2016, 01:26 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Well unfortunately for you, but fortunately for everybody else you do not get to decide who is guilty or not. If there were "proof" that he committed sexual assault he very well would be charged with a crime. Well, fortunately for Donald Trump, but unfortunately for women, how does a woman prove she didn't "let" Donald Trump grab her by the ***** because he is a star? RE: NYT: Trump assaulted two women - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 10-15-2016 (10-14-2016, 09:31 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Nobody here condones sexual assault That's not true. I've read four people in this thread alone who have made excuses. RE: NYT: Trump assaulted two women - NATI BENGALS - 10-15-2016 Just listen to The Don's arguments. Have you seen these women? In their wildest dreams would the orange phenom pursue them sexually. It doesnt get more concrete than that that he didnt do these things. Brag about it on video, smile about the accusations, children with multiple wives, obsession with beauty pageants, soooo what. Just because he talked about it, lived it, and made a career out of it doesnt mean he did it. Wait, what? TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP GRAB EM BY THE PUS** RE: NYT: Trump assaulted two women - hollodero - 10-15-2016 (10-15-2016, 01:26 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Well unfortunately for you, but fortunately for everybody else you do not get to decide who is guilty or not. If there were "proof" that he committed sexual assault he very well would be charged with a crime. So as long as he is not actually charged with a crime, you keep backing him up no matter what. As if it were about sentencing him to prison and you were a juror. When in fact it's about making him your next president and you are a voter. A situation where a different mindset is to be applied. Regarding "lynch mob": All the "lynching" that's on the table right now is not voting for him and recognizing that he amongst other things is a sexist, amoral douchebag (but not convicted of a crime! Good luck explaining this logic to your kids one day). You chose a peculiar word here. Now if people would shout "lock him up!", I would at least get your point. RE: NYT: Trump assaulted two women - BmorePat87 - 10-15-2016 (10-14-2016, 06:18 PM)bfine32 Wrote: ..and you're still not answering the questions posed so you can write your own narrative. I made it pretty clear that I'm not interested in entertaining your false comparisons. RE: NYT: Trump assaulted two women - BmorePat87 - 10-15-2016 (10-14-2016, 05:44 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: And people wonder why sexual assault victims don't come forward very often. He has now also said that the one from the plane isn't good looking enough for him to do that. Not that groping is bad, but that she's not good looking enough to grope. How does anyone defend this? RE: NYT: Trump assaulted two women - BmorePat87 - 10-15-2016 (10-15-2016, 02:43 AM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: Just listen to The Don's arguments. Have you seen these women? In their wildest dreams would the orange phenom pursue them sexually. It doesnt get more concrete than that that he didnt do these things. He doesn't defend himself by saying sexual assault is bad. He defends himself by saying these women aren't good looking enough for him to sexually assault. This is a man who has been caught on camera saying about preteen girls "I'll be dating her in 10 years". A man who told a radio host he could call his daughter "a piece of ass" and talked about her breasts with him. We have people screaming for family values, traditional marriage, and that trans people are predators. Meanwhile, they're defending this man. Party over integrity. RE: NYT: Trump assaulted two women - Vas Deferens - 10-15-2016 (10-15-2016, 09:18 AM)BmorePat87 Wrote: He doesn't defend himself by saying sexual assault is bad. He defends himself by saying these women aren't good looking enough for him to sexually assault. Ha. Integrity. RE: NYT: Trump assaulted two women - xxlt - 10-15-2016 (10-13-2016, 08:22 PM)6andcounting Wrote: r/The Donald has already discovered the accuser's claim has oddly specific details that were plagiarized verbatim from a sexual assault case that happened two years before she said Trump did something to her. The story also involves a movable armrest - something that doesn't exist in first-class. Simply finding the flight records would reveal which plane they were on and if it was the one in a million plane that had movable armrests in first class. There is just one tiny problem: the victim never said the arm rest was moved. But keep defending sexual assault and denigrating women. You wear it well. Almost as well as DT himself. RE: NYT: Trump assaulted two women - bfine32 - 10-15-2016 (10-15-2016, 09:08 AM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I made it pretty clear that I'm not interested in entertaining your false comparisons. What you've made clear is that your opinions are based on assumptions. Not sure what is false about disputing things that you insert into the narrative. RE: NYT: Trump assaulted two women - xxlt - 10-15-2016 (10-14-2016, 08:25 PM)Vas Deferens Wrote: It kind of gives the claims of daddy putting his hand up womens skirts a little more credence when daddy says himself he's able to 'grab them by the *****'. Have you seen the pictures of the hillbillies at his rallies wearing "Donald grab my snatch" and "Trump, grab my wormens *****"?! I go back and forth on the plant theory, with people like these and a handful of posters on here making me think he is a real candidate who will get real votes, maybe even some electoral votes. After all, everything is bigger in Texas, including ignorance... |