2020 Election - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums) +--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0) +--- Thread: 2020 Election (/Thread-2020-Election) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
|
RE: 2020 Election - Big Boss - 10-07-2020 Meanwhile, we've gone from him "absolutely" releasing his tax returns "after audit" in 2016 to him escalating a New York State subpoena for said tax returns all the way up to the Supreme Court four years later. For a man with nothing to hide, he sure is petrified of these returns getting out. But I suppose it's totally normal for people to fight cases at the Supreme Court level for the sake of principle. Definitely nothing odd about it whatsoever. RE: 2020 Election - Nately120 - 10-07-2020 (10-07-2020, 01:23 PM)Big Boss Wrote: Meanwhile, we've gone from him "absolutely" releasing his tax returns "after audit" in 2016 to him escalating a New York State subpoena for said tax returns all the way up to the Supreme Court four years later. And yet it is argued that your own unreasonable bias and/or the unfair media is what convinced you to be mad about that fact. RE: 2020 Election - Big Boss - 10-07-2020 (10-07-2020, 01:28 PM)Nately120 Wrote: And yet it is argued that your own unreasonable bias and/or the unfair media is what convinced you to be mad about that fact. I've yet to hear a compelling argument for why he shouldn't release them or why it's totally normal for him to fight this in the Supreme Court. They're tax returns. If there's nothing to hide, then release them. Easy peasy. If nothing else, you're taking one of the Democrats' main talking points away from them. Going to these lengths to prevent them from being released suggests that there is something to hide. Deductive reasoning. RE: 2020 Election - bfine32 - 10-07-2020 Those with a higher standard: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/nbc-uses-msnbc-identified-biden-supporters-as-undecided-for-townhall/ar-BB19NqmU?ocid=msedgntp Quote:Peter Gonzalez and Ismael Llano asked Biden questions at the Miami town hall Monday, which was hosted by Lester Holt, as part of an “audience of undecided Florida voters.” RE: 2020 Election - BmorePat87 - 10-07-2020 It's pretty tough defending the administration's record on Covid, especially as Trump is currently infected, but he is not doing himself any favors by dismissing 211k deaths or attempting to defend the rose garden event that infected a dozen people. RE: 2020 Election - GMDino - 10-08-2020 (10-07-2020, 09:44 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Those with a higher standard: Might be true, might not be. But not sure the Washington Free Beacon is a "higher standard" source to use. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Free_Beacon Quote:The Washington Free Beacon[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Free_Beacon#cite_note-WFB-13][/url] RE: 2020 Election - BmorePat87 - 10-08-2020 The commission that runs the debate switched it to virtual this morning. Trump has already come out saying he won't do it now. https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/08/politics/second-presidential-debate-virtual/index.html?utm_medium=social&utm_term=link&utm_content=2020-10-08T12%3A20%3A33&utm_source=fbCNNp&fbclid=IwAR24xsXSV2fFQ4DO9UlKgkGSYkroUHL4giO0XFsilImYCQChuiS0zZXGi7g The debate was to be town hall style. The Trump campaign accused the commission of unilaterally canceling the event to help Biden and said that Trump would hold rallies... RE: 2020 Election - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 10-08-2020 (10-08-2020, 09:52 AM)BmorePat87 Wrote: The commission that runs the debate switched it to virtual this morning. Trump has already come out saying he won't do it now. Don’t be afraid of debate. Don’t let it dominate your life. RE: 2020 Election - GMDino - 10-08-2020 (10-08-2020, 09:52 AM)BmorePat87 Wrote: The commission that runs the debate switched it to virtual this morning. Trump has already come out saying he won't do it now. I'm stunned that Trump is complaining and lying. Simple stunned. RE: 2020 Election - Big Boss - 10-08-2020 So Trump wants to do a rally instead. Cater to the voters he already has in pocket, instead of trying to win new voters or win back the ones he lost. Great strategy. RE: 2020 Election - BmorePat87 - 10-08-2020 (10-08-2020, 10:47 AM)Big Boss Wrote: So Trump wants to do a rally instead. Cater to the voters he already has in pocket, instead of trying to win new voters or win back the ones he lost. He's actually being a pious man and religious man. Offering them the gift of Covid, the blessing from god. RE: 2020 Election - Big Boss - 10-08-2020 This phone interview is WILD. https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1314174756430774273.html RE: 2020 Election - GMDino - 10-08-2020 (10-08-2020, 11:11 AM)Big Boss Wrote: This phone interview is WILD. He does a good job of covering the POTUS. RE: 2020 Election - Au165 - 10-08-2020 (10-08-2020, 11:11 AM)Big Boss Wrote: This phone interview is WILD. He is mentally ill. RE: 2020 Election - bfine32 - 10-08-2020 (10-08-2020, 08:57 AM)GMDino Wrote: Might be true, might not be. Says the guy using wikipedia RE: 2020 Election - bfine32 - 10-08-2020 POTUS doesn't have a leg to stand on in cancelling the debate. He's the one that contracted COVID. RE: 2020 Election - Au165 - 10-08-2020 (10-08-2020, 11:21 AM)bfine32 Wrote: POTUS doesn't have a leg to stand on in cancelling the debate. He's the one that contracted COVID. The real issue he has is with the potential ability to mute him. His reasoning thrown in at the end of him saying he was out was "they can mute whenever they feel like it" in a virtual debate and that is the crux of the whole thing. He thinks he is "winning" the debate by screaming over everyone, and while it may play well with his entrenched base, it is off-putting to almost everyone else. He would actually be better off in a scenario where he can't do it, but his logic is that is how he wins so without it he has no interest in the debate. The whole idea he is going to hold a rally, while potentially being COVID positive, is further showing his disregard for the virus. It could also expose him to local or state level charges depending on where this rally would be held. RE: 2020 Election - GMDino - 10-08-2020 (10-08-2020, 11:19 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Says the guy using wikipedia https://freebeacon.com/about/ https://web.archive.org/web/20140125104836/http://freebeacon.com/about/ https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/bensmith/eliana-johnson-free-beacon Quote:Eliana Johnson, whose most recent work includes a hair-raising account of Trump’s visit to Mount Vernon, will take over a staff of 24 from the Beacon’s founding editor, Matthew Continetti. I mean citations and facts and all are considered bad by the right but hey, you do you. RE: 2020 Election - bfine32 - 10-08-2020 (10-08-2020, 11:25 AM)Au165 Wrote: The real issue he has is with the potential ability to mute him. His reasoning thrown in at the end of him saying he was out was "they can mute whenever they feel like it" in a virtual debate and that is the crux of the whole thing. He thinks he is "winning" the debate by screaming over everyone, and while it may play well with his entrenched base, it is off-putting to almost everyone else. He would actually be better off in a scenario where he can't do it, but his logic is that is how he wins so without it he has no interest in the debate. Agree 100% RE: 2020 Election - bfine32 - 10-08-2020 (10-08-2020, 11:37 AM)GMDino Wrote: Nah, I just found it funny that someone tried to slam a source by citing wikipedia, but it's most likely just me. |