+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Cincinnati-Bengals-NFL)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-JUNGLE-NOISE)
+--- Thread: Bengals interested in J.C. Jackson (/Thread-Bengals-interested-in-J-C-Jackson)
RE: Bengals interested in J.C. Jackson - casear2727 - 03-10-2022
(03-10-2022, 11:33 AM)Synric Wrote: Laremy Tunsil is not a free agent and will require alot of draft capital to acquire... hearing 2 1st round picks at least.
I think we all know this... been talked about for a couple weeks now. The cost has varied from the #31 and maybe a later pick to two 1st rounders.
The consensus is that two 1st rounders is too expensive but the other is doable...
RE: Bengals interested in J.C. Jackson - jj22 - 03-13-2022
Chargers are favorite to land JC Jackson.
RE: Bengals interested in J.C. Jackson - jj22 - 03-14-2022
Chargers bag JC.
RE: Bengals interested in J.C. Jackson - Au165 - 03-14-2022
(03-14-2022, 05:55 PM)jj22 Wrote: Chargers bag JC.
He only went for 16.4 per, a little surprised and definitely not insanely out of our reach.
RE: Bengals interested in J.C. Jackson - Ell Prez - 03-14-2022
(03-14-2022, 06:02 PM)Au165 Wrote: He only went for 16.4 per, a little surprised and definitely not insanely out of our reach.
Damn. I would have liked to have him and call it a Day. 16 isn’t bad for a turnover machine like him.
RE: Bengals interested in J.C. Jackson - kalibengal - 03-14-2022
(03-14-2022, 06:47 PM)Ell Prez Wrote: Damn. I would have liked to have him and call it a Day. 16 isn’t bad for a turnover machine like him.
LA C not screwing around...JC and Mack in last few days..not bad
Mack and Bosa with JC back there
Herberts chances of going far just got way better