+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums)
+--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0)
+---- Forum: P & R Archive (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-P-R-Archive)
+---- Thread: Hills slams over 11 million American Citizens (/Thread-Hills-slams-over-11-million-American-Citizens)
RE: Hills slams over 11 million American Citizens - bfine32 - 09-15-2016
(09-15-2016, 09:36 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: If these people are adamant in their beliefs, why would it be an insult to call them what they are? Is there a preferred term for someone who thinks gay people do not deserve rights that they won't find insulting?
Bigot would most likely be the correct term for someone that thinks gays do not deserve rights. Not sure if it is preferred or not. The problem is; like many slurs, it is over used and often loses its effect, when properly applied.
RE: Hills slams over 11 million American Citizens - BmorePat87 - 09-15-2016
(09-15-2016, 09:58 PM)GMDino Wrote: Republicans?
Many Republicans (35%) support gay rights while some Democrats (30%) do not. Yea, there is a considerable difference, but it's not fair to lump them all together on that issue.
RE: Hills slams over 11 million American Citizens - GMDino - 09-15-2016
(09-15-2016, 10:11 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Many Republicans (35%) support gay rights while some Democrats (30%) do not. Yea, there is a considerable difference, but it's not fair to lump them all together on that issue.
Still 65% would be deplorable/Republicans. Over the half number Clinton used.
