(09-29-2015, 03:42 PM)Naranja Tigre Wrote: I said many many posts ago that they killed their enemies.

This all started because somebody said it went against nature to care for those who couldn't care for themselves, I said cave men did it, and you said no, they ate eachother.

Now Ive shown you they did care for eachother, with your precious scientific evidence, but I'm not going to hold my breath waiting on an apology for all the crap you've talked.

(09-29-2015, 03:51 PM)Naranja Tigre Wrote: Of course they were members of the family. You cared for your own, just like people who pay for their family members to be on respirators today.

(09-29-2015, 03:57 PM)fredtoast Wrote: I could very well have been that only the members of the "rulers" family were taken care of if they were crippled while all others that were defective were killed or left to die.

That is a huge problem with people who do research.  They decide what they are looking for before they look for it.  That causes them to make conclusions that are not valid.

(09-29-2015, 03:54 PM)Benton Wrote: Science isn't crap. It's... science.

(09-29-2015, 12:31 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Would you rank Maxwell's equation as the #1 scientific theory/law of all time?

(09-29-2015, 04:27 PM)michaelsean Wrote: I got it at #2 on my big board.

(09-29-2015, 04:31 PM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: Now I'm curious. 

(09-29-2015, 04:54 PM)michaelsean Wrote: You wanna know my first don't you.

(09-29-2015, 04:58 PM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: That's not what I'm curious about but, since you asked, sure why not.

(09-29-2015, 05:02 PM)michaelsean Wrote: I was bluffing.

(09-29-2015, 04:31 PM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: Now I'm curious. 

(09-29-2015, 05:07 PM)GMDino Wrote: I always suspected you were....curious. ""

(09-29-2015, 05:54 PM)Benton Wrote: Bi what?

(09-29-2015, 03:24 PM)Naranja Tigre Wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1317867/Prehistoric-humans-compassion-cared-others.html


Booyah.

You guys are a joke.

(09-29-2015, 03:42 PM)Naranja Tigre Wrote: I said many many posts ago that they killed their enemies.

This all started because somebody said it went against nature to care for those who couldn't care for themselves, I said cave men did it, and you said no, they ate eachother.

Now Ive shown you they did care for eachother, with your precious scientific evidence, but I'm not going to hold my breath waiting on an apology for all the crap you've talked.

(09-30-2015, 11:14 AM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: This all started when someone asked a question about life support and you offered "cavemen" brought food to the injured and asked how did you know.  Pay attention, engineer.

"Precious scientific evidence" is an usual attitude towards science from an alleged electrical engineering major whose chosen field of study is based upon "precious scientific evidence."  More evidence of why I believe you're a fraud.

(09-30-2015, 11:08 AM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Was that so difficult?

(10-01-2015, 01:04 AM)Naranja Tigre Wrote: I guess I just I have to chuckle at anonymous dudes on the internet doing peer review, as if they don't get enough tedious research and study in their day to day lives, like me. I guess they don't.

I love a little respite from memorizing formulas and laws.

(10-01-2015, 01:05 AM)Naranja Tigre Wrote: Nope.

What's difficult is getting you posers to admit when you're wrong.

(10-01-2015, 12:13 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote:  
I have to chuckle when a fraud believes asking "How do you know this?" is a peer review.
 

If it wasn't so difficult why do you act like you've completed a difficult task when you "site" some "precious scientific evidence"?
 
Why should Benton admit he was wrong when you originally asked him if an article you didn't read stated something it didn't state?

(10-01-2015, 12:24 PM)Naranja Tigre Wrote: He should admit he's wrong because.....he's wrong.

And if you people won't admit you're wrong even when I prove it, I'm not going to bother proving anything anymore. It's not worth it.