![]() |
Annual inspections of abortion clinics, pre-empting St. Louis ord. part of proposal - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums) +--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0) +---- Forum: P & R Archive (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-P-R-Archive) +---- Thread: Annual inspections of abortion clinics, pre-empting St. Louis ord. part of proposal (/Thread-Annual-inspections-of-abortion-clinics-pre-empting-St-Louis-ord-part-of-proposal) |
Annual inspections of abortion clinics, pre-empting St. Louis ord. part of proposal - GMDino - 06-22-2017 http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/missouri-house-advances-tougher-abortion-restrictions/article_95d3182d-f65b-56ea-8a9d-e7b7e1b0ab1e.html Quote:JEFFERSON CITY • Abortion restrictions at the center of a second special session called by Gov. Eric Greitens are one step closer to his desk, but they could still face significant hurdles in the Senate. RE: Annual inspections of abortion clinics, pre-empting St. Louis ord. part of proposal - GMDino - 06-22-2017 https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/missouri/articles/2017-05-03/women-dressed-in-handmaids-tale-garb-protest-at-capitol Quote:EFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — Eleven women dressed in costumes from the television show "The Handmaid's Tale" are drawing attention in the Missouri Capitol as they protest a proposal aimed at limiting abortion funding. RE: Annual inspections of abortion clinics, pre-empting St. Louis ord. part of proposal - michaelsean - 06-23-2017 I have a question. Landlord's and abortion and contraception? How does that even come up? And ambulances on emergency runs should use lights and sirens. They are there for a reason. RE: Annual inspections of abortion clinics, pre-empting St. Louis ord. part of proposal - Benton - 06-23-2017 (06-23-2017, 09:14 AM)michaelsean Wrote: I have a question. Landlord's and abortion and contraception? How does that even come up? It's lumped in together. Employers are the big issue as they could know about all three and, depending on their personal beliefs, opt not to keep/hire an employee. The landlord, I'm guessing, was added primarily for the pregnancy issue. But it's simpler to keep the language the same and not have a separate bill. RE: Annual inspections of abortion clinics, pre-empting St. Louis ord. part of proposal - michaelsean - 06-23-2017 (06-23-2017, 09:35 AM)Benton Wrote: It's lumped in together. Employers are the big issue as they could know about all three and, depending on their personal beliefs, opt not to keep/hire an employee. The landlord, I'm guessing, was added primarily for the pregnancy issue. But it's simpler to keep the language the same and not have a separate bill. Ahhhhh RE: Annual inspections of abortion clinics, pre-empting St. Louis ord. part of proposal - michaelsean - 06-23-2017 (06-22-2017, 06:52 PM)GMDino Wrote: https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/missouri/articles/2017-05-03/women-dressed-in-handmaids-tale-garb-protest-at-capitol I'm having a hard time seeing the connection between The Handmaiden's Tale and limiting funding for abortion. RE: Annual inspections of abortion clinics, pre-empting St. Louis ord. part of proposal - GMDino - 06-23-2017 (06-23-2017, 09:49 AM)michaelsean Wrote: I'm having a hard time seeing the connection between The Handmaiden's Tale and limiting funding for abortion. The way I take some women feel that a group of men trying to make a legal reproductive right illegal or incredibly hard to get is similar to the fictional tale where women are treated as property that have no control over their own bodies. A stretch? Yes. However allowing business owners to hire/fire/not hire based on the promiscuity of the applicant seems to be pushing the limits also. IMHO it's a shame they had to pass a resolution to STOP that from happening in the first place. Single woman get's pregnant. Applies for a job and is turned down because that goes against the beliefs of the owner/boss. Gets govt assistance while looking for a job and is called a welfare queen who is too lazy to work. Finds a job that pays less and still needs food stamps only to see those cut because the GOP wants to put the pride back in working. Then they cut Head Start, school lunch programs, education funding, etc...and the cycle starts all over again. Again, just my humble opinion. RE: Annual inspections of abortion clinics, pre-empting St. Louis ord. part of proposal - michaelsean - 06-23-2017 (06-23-2017, 10:01 AM)GMDino Wrote: The way I take some women feel that a group of men trying to make a legal reproductive right illegal or incredibly hard to get is similar to the fictional tale where women are treated as property that have no control over their own bodies. I get that part. I mean my real belief is that you should be able to hire who you want for whatever reason you want, but I understand that doesn't work in real life. RE: Annual inspections of abortion clinics, pre-empting St. Louis ord. part of proposal - GMDino - 06-23-2017 (06-23-2017, 10:10 AM)michaelsean Wrote: I get that part. I mean my real belief is that you should be able to hire who you want for whatever reason you want, but I understand that doesn't work in real life. It's just always seemed to me that you hire the person that can do the job the way your want/the right way (not always the same I've found). If you are willing to train them that expands the people you can hire. If you are basing your hiring on race, creed, sex, etc it just seems wrong. I am against premarital sex. One of my holdovers from my Catholic upbringing and real world observations. But I'd never refuse to higher someone who was a single parent just for that reason. I suppose that is part of the frustration I feel with these constant and redundant attempts to write a law that THIS TIME will be found constitutional while taking away someone's right. Even as I disagree with abortion. |