+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Cincinnati-Bengals-NFL)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-JUNGLE-NOISE)
+--- Thread: NO LEONARD FOURNETTE (/Thread-NO-LEONARD-FOURNETTE)
Pages:
1
2
NO LEONARD FOURNETTE - thillan - 11-05-2017
BY GOD, ITS A MIRACLE. THE FOOTBALL GODS ARE TRYING TO GIVE THE BENGALS A CHANCE.
And my fantasy football team has officially lost as well.
RE: NO LEONARD FOURNETTE - rfaulk34 - 11-05-2017
(11-05-2017, 01:30 PM)thillan Wrote: BY GOD, ITS A MIRACLE. THE FOOTBALL GODS ARE TRYING TO GIVE THE BENGALS A CHANCE.
And my fantasy football team has officially lost as well.
Report is, he broke a team rule and is inactive for the game.
RE: NO LEONARD FOURNETTE - Go Cards - 11-05-2017
This is huge !
RE: NO LEONARD FOURNETTE - Pat5775 - 11-05-2017
Odds that we can take advantage of this?? Hopefully this means Bortles will be throwing a hell of a lot more now
RE: NO LEONARD FOURNETTE - thillan - 11-05-2017
(11-05-2017, 01:38 PM)Pat5775 Wrote: Odds that we can take advantage of this?? Hopefully this means Bortles will be throwing a hell of a lot more now
Yeah Chris Ivory is still a good back, but if we can make Bortles have to beat us, I like our chances more now. If the O-line can be at least halfway decent, then we can make just one or two more big plays.
RE: NO LEONARD FOURNETTE - Bengalholic - 11-05-2017
Jeremy Hill is also out for the Bengals. Mixon gets the start.
RE: NO LEONARD FOURNETTE - thillan - 11-05-2017
(11-05-2017, 01:41 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: Jeremy Hill is also out for the Bengals.
Yeah, that doesn't really worry me at all though. Having John Ross out yet again is what irks me even more.
RE: NO LEONARD FOURNETTE - masonbengals fan - 11-05-2017
Lucked out but will still be lucky to escape with a W
RE: NO LEONARD FOURNETTE - Shake n Blake - 11-05-2017
Yay!
*Realizes that TJ Yeldon went for 122 yards on 9 carries last time Fournette was out*
Noooooooooooo!!!
RE: NO LEONARD FOURNETTE - thillan - 11-05-2017
(11-05-2017, 01:53 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Yay!
*Realizes that TJ Yeldon went for 122 yards on 9 carries last time Fournette was out*
Noooooooooooo!!!
LMAO so true! I was kinda excited to see Fournette at the same time too, because he is a freak of nature. Could already be a top 3-5 RB.
RE: NO LEONARD FOURNETTE - The Real Deal - 11-05-2017
Betcha money bengals still lose today, but this does give them a slightly better chance of proving me wrong.
RE: NO LEONARD FOURNETTE - leonardfan40 - 11-05-2017
(11-05-2017, 01:53 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Yay!
*Realizes that TJ Yeldon went for 122 yards on 9 carries last time Fournette was out*
Noooooooooooo!!!
Yep lol I claimed him in my fantasy league the second I read this thread lol figure him against Cincy is probably better than C.J. Anderson with a new QB against Philly
RE: NO LEONARD FOURNETTE - bfine32 - 11-05-2017
(11-05-2017, 01:41 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: Jeremy Hill is also out for the Bengals. Mixon gets the start.
NFL radio said Gio was starting
As for Hill; didn't he get hurt in the Indy game?
RE: NO LEONARD FOURNETTE - jfkbengals - 11-05-2017
(11-05-2017, 01:49 PM)thillan Wrote: Yeah, that doesn't really worry me at all though. Having John Ross out yet again is what irks me even more.
Why? Considering his limited practice time he would probably be a liability in special teams cohesion, nor would he be ready for anything more than certain packages. If he is going to take an active spot but be limited to certain packages, he better damn well be on the same page with the QB and the rest of the offense. Better to get him fully up to speed in practices before working him into games.
RE: NO LEONARD FOURNETTE - thillan - 11-05-2017
(11-05-2017, 02:12 PM)jfkbengals Wrote: Why? Considering his limited practice time he would probably be a liability in special teams cohesion, nor would he be ready for anything more than certain packages. If he is going to take an active spot but be limited to certain packages, he better damn well be on the same page with the QB and the rest of the offense. Better to get him fully up to speed in practices before working him into games.
It irks me because we picked him 9th overall, and it's week 9, and I've seen him targeted once. I'm frustrated at the situation we are facing with our Top 10 pick is all.. not saying he would be the game breaker today.
RE: NO LEONARD FOURNETTE - McC - 11-05-2017
Is this how lightly the Jags take the Bengals?
RE: NO LEONARD FOURNETTE - jfkbengals - 11-05-2017
(11-05-2017, 02:13 PM)thillan Wrote: It irks me because we picked him 9th overall, and it's week 9, and I've seen him targeted once. I'm frustrated at the situation we are facing with our Top 10 pick is all.. not saying he would be the game breaker today.
Understandable, but we need to look at what is best for the team in both the short and long term before looking at his short term usege. I think he will be limited to practice only the next two weeks before returning to the active 46 against the Browns. Obviously this is predicated on the rest of the WR corp staying healthy.
RE: NO LEONARD FOURNETTE - jfkbengals - 11-05-2017
Jay Glazer says he missed the team photo, a workout, and a treatment session.
RE: NO LEONARD FOURNETTE - thillan - 11-05-2017
(11-05-2017, 02:18 PM)jfkbengals Wrote: Understandable, but we need to look at what is best for the team in both the short and long term before looking at his short term usege. I think he will be limited to practice only the next two weeks before returning to the active 46 against the Browns. Obviously this is predicated on the rest of the WR corp staying healthy.
I agree.
RE: NO LEONARD FOURNETTE - THE PISTONS - 11-05-2017
(11-05-2017, 01:31 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Report is, he broke a team rule and is inactive for the game.
Coughlin is building a culture in Jacksonville.
The Bengals let guys keep acting like fools on and off the field with no ramifications.