Bengals bungal, as usual. - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Cincinnati-Bengals-NFL) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-JUNGLE-NOISE) +--- Thread: Bengals bungal, as usual. (/Thread-Bengals-bungal-as-usual) |
RE: Bengals bungal, as usual. - coachmcneil71 - 01-15-2018 (01-15-2018, 02:37 AM)Shake n Blake Wrote: I'll do my best to explain this to you, but somehow I doubt you'll be willing to listen: I don't need you to explain this team or anything football related to me Shake. You're not qualified. I'm well aware of the " scheme change". Doesn't change the fact that he was underwhelming and didn't do his job. RE: Bengals bungal, as usual. - Synric - 01-15-2018 (01-15-2018, 02:55 AM)coachmcneil71 Wrote: Obviously, the line was terrible. That was evident the day we lost Z & Whit. Yet, the moron's in charge drafted a WR & a RB in that order. The kid may still do something, but he certainly wasn't the savior that many claimed he would be. Bad analogy. A better one would be Your job is to fill out paperwork but your boss gave you an unsharpened pencil and told you to do it with your left hand (assuming your a righty). RE: Bengals bungal, as usual. - rfaulk34 - 01-15-2018 (01-15-2018, 03:13 AM)coachmcneil71 Wrote: It appears that he is because you're seemingly not understanding that if the blocking in front of you is bad, you're probably not going to go anywhere. RE: Bengals bungal, as usual. - coachmcneil71 - 01-15-2018 (01-15-2018, 03:52 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: It appears that he is because you're seemingly not understanding that if the blocking in front of you is bad, you're probably not going to go anywhere. Mixon is 6'1", right at 230 pounds and runs a 4.43. If the kid can't pick up 2-3 yards per carry, even with poor blocking, then there's a problem with his running style. See previous post regarding Payton,Sanders, and Dillon. Every casual football fan n the country knows that this line blows. They also know that the Bengals are fond of drafting thugs. Trust me, they all know,so it's a pretty safe assumption that a lifelong Bengal fan may be aware of that inconvenience. Doesn't sway my opinion or change his stats. RE: Bengals bungal, as usual. - bengalsturntup926 - 01-15-2018 Eh I kind of agree kind of don't, I thought he improved later in the season with the o line and our best back. But is he special like fornette or zeke ,probably not . I'm more worried that mixon can take the punishment ,he got took out a couple of times I think. But I agree you got to be physical with the steelers. RE: Bengals bungal, as usual. - sandwedge - 01-15-2018 (01-14-2018, 03:39 PM)coachmcneil71 Wrote: Mixon couldn't carry Fournette's, Hunt's, Kamara's, or Cook's jock strap.Why would he want to carry another man's jock? RE: Bengals bungal, as usual. - sandwedge - 01-15-2018 (01-15-2018, 03:13 AM)coachmcneil71 Wrote: you can't be this dense? RE: Bengals bungal, as usual. - Trademark - 01-15-2018 Mixon will be a great back, let’s not forget how he gashed Pittsburgh the second time they played until he got hurt. Gio should be our number 1 though RE: Bengals bungal, as usual. - TKUHL - 01-15-2018 (01-15-2018, 02:55 AM)coachmcneil71 Wrote: Obviously, the line was terrible. That was evident the day we lost Z & Whit. Yet, the moron's in charge drafted a WR & a RB in that order. The kid may still do something, but he certainly wasn't the savior that many claimed he would be. FWIW we didn't need to trade up for Cook he was there for us to pick, we traded back with the Vikes, they picked Cook. I liked Kamara also but it's easier to say who you would rather have. I'm tired of all the excuses year after year with this team but that line is historically bad. Hopefully it gets fixed fast so we know what we have with Mixon. RE: Bengals bungal, as usual. - grampahol - 01-15-2018 So what are you going to do "coach"? Pretend that if you're right about Mixon the rest of us should make you the king of the boards? Fine, you'll be the king, Mixon a terrible draft pick, a horrible human being for ever more and more importantly a bust. Yey for you. RE: Bengals bungal, as usual. - John Shaft - 01-15-2018 Jacksonville utilized a TRUE FULLBACK to great effect ! Most teams don't even have one on the roster. Not a freaking H-back. I-Formation with a FULLBACK. RE: Bengals bungal, as usual. - BonnieBengal - 01-15-2018 (01-15-2018, 12:38 AM)coachmcneil71 Wrote: I agree, Holic. That said, he's still way behind hose other backs. And you throw in a defense of Kaepernick along with your idiocy. He was never banned for fighting inequality. If he could play worth a damn, he'd be playing. He also wore socks with pigs dressed as cops and a shirt with Fidel Castro on it. Yeah, celebrating a Communist dictator who oppressed his own people is the same as fighting for inequality. RE: Bengals bungal, as usual. - BonnieBengal - 01-15-2018 (01-15-2018, 02:06 AM)Pat5775 Wrote: I could have sworn a few people in this thread were recently accused/outed as "troll profiles" belonging to a certain individual who came clean?? It better not be the same list as the one that showed up on the old Bengals board and someone claimed I'm not real. That was a damn lie. RE: Bengals bungal, as usual. - Beaker - 01-15-2018 (01-15-2018, 12:38 AM)coachmcneil71 Wrote: Clearly, I was trolling just to see how many of you were gonna home. RE: Bengals bungal, as usual. - grampahol - 01-15-2018 (01-15-2018, 09:33 AM)BonnieBengal Wrote: It better not be the same list as the one that showed up on the old Bengals board and someone claimed I'm not real. That was a damn lie.Damn..nobody is claiming to be me. I feel left out.. Nah..you have your own unique style. Some of us can tell and some wouldn't know unique if it ran up and bit them on the ass with plague infested bat teeth.. Perhaps that wasn't the best metaphor I ever came up with.. RE: Bengals bungal, as usual. - fredtoast - 01-15-2018 (01-15-2018, 12:38 AM)coachmcneil71 Wrote: I agree, Holic. That said, he's still way behind hose other backs. Dumbest post I have seen in a long time. Basically hen doesn't like Mixon because of the assault from year ago, so now he says that Mixon sucks and it is impossible for the offensive line to have anything to do with a RBs production. Basically bragging about being a troll and bragging about being to stupid to understand that ythe O-line can have a lot to do with a RBs production. aren't there rules against trolling here? Shouldn't something happen when a memeber brags about beinbg a troll? RE: Bengals bungal, as usual. - McC - 01-15-2018 (01-15-2018, 01:08 AM)coachmcneil71 Wrote: Just having fun on the boards man, but there is some serious truth in my post. Time will tell, but season #1 for the great savior RB ( that was drafted n the second, just after drafting a bust wr in the first; when the team clearly needed olineman & linebackers) is in the books, with a big pile of steaming nothing! Much like the first round selection.Having fun my ass. You started with what seemed like a substance induced rant and when thirty different people embarrassed you on it, you started trying to change the point. When that didn't work, then you came up with the whole trolling/just having fun excuse. And as to serious truth, there was very little of that. RE: Bengals bungal, as usual. - grampahol - 01-15-2018 Now now..you're hurting the feelings of the board king.. RE: Bengals bungal, as usual. - SHRacerX - 01-15-2018 (01-14-2018, 03:39 PM)coachmcneil71 Wrote: Mixon couldn't carry Fournette's, Hunt's, Kamara's, or Cook's jock strap. And, although I am sure this has already been debated but...How did the offensive lines form Jax, KC, NO, or Minnesota rank compared to our dead-last suck fest? At least Alexander is gone, and the line will definately be addressed in the offseason. I think they will draft a tackle early, and they will go after one in Free Agency. Mixon, when he was finally given a real opportunity, did quite well down the stretch and he was gashing a Ravens line (which was one of the best in the league) the final game of the season. And no one can go Burkhead on me, saying that game didn't matter to the Ratbirds. Boyd really showed what he can do when given the opportunity that game as well. Ditto Kroft. Since our season started and, with the exception of a brief improvement the final two games, continued all season long as a massive suck fest on many fronts, I was somewhat happy that Mixon didn't have the kind of season that Hunt or Kamara enjoyed. I think he will be hungry this offseason and will come in next year with a chip on his shoulder....I can only hope Ross not only does the same, but gets the opportunity that was thwarted this season. RE: Bengals bungal, as usual. - SHRacerX - 01-15-2018 (01-14-2018, 04:22 PM)coachmcneil71 Wrote: The point is, they are punchng Pitt in the mouth. We could/should be doing the same, but for some reason we cant. We could have a backfield of Earl Campbell and Bo Jackson and they STILL wouldn't be punching pitt in the mouth. We would be averaging about 2 ypc. This line needs to go with Redmond and Westerman (either at center or guard) and Boling (either at LT or LG, if Westerman plays center) and get a draft pick for RT (if Boling able to stay at LT, which I am somewhat surprised hasn't been more of a topic after how he played the final two games). Plus, we would need a leader on the offensive line to be the attitude that we need. Too many pacifists on this line the way it was constructed early this year. |